UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

 

 Filed by the Registrant Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

 

Filed by the Registrant    ☒                                                           Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement.Statement
Confidential, Forfor Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)).
Definitive Proxy Statement.Statement
☐ Definitive Additional Materials.Materials
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12.Pursuant to §240.14a-12

COLFAX CORPORATION

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Thanother than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
No fee required.
☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)
2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)
3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)
4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)
5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)3)

Filing Party:

(4)4)

Date Filed:


 
Notice of 2019
Annual Meeting
of Stockholders

 

LOGO

Proxy Statement

and

Notice of Special Meeting

February 28, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. ET


LOGO

    , 2022

Dear Stockholders of Colfax Corporation:

On behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Colfax Corporation (“Colfax” or the “Company”), you are cordially invited to virtually attend a Special Meeting of Stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) to be held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, on February 28, 2022, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM.

At the Special Meeting, stockholders will consider and vote on a proposal to adopt and approve an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation that effects (a) a reverse stock split of our outstanding shares of common stock, at one of three reverse stock split ratios, one-for-two,one-for-three or one-for-four, with the exact ratio to be determined by our Board at a later date, and (b) if and when the reverse stock split is effected, a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of our common stock by the selected reverse stock split ratio.

Colfax intends to effect the reverse stock split and authorized share count reduction in connection with and immediately following the previously announced separation (the “Spin-off”) of its existing fabrication technology business, which will operate as ESAB Corporation (“ESAB”), and its specialty medical technology businesses, which will operate under the new name Enovis Corporation (“Enovis”). If the Spin-off is completed, then the market price and trading ranges of Enovis’s common stock will no longer reflect the value of the ESAB business. With a reverse stock split, the price of each common share is expected to increase so that a stockholder would have fewer but higher priced shares. A reverse stock split would not have any impact on the voting and other rights of stockholders, and would have no impact on the Company’s business operations or any of its outstanding indebtedness.

Even if the reverse stock split proposal is approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Board may delay or abandon the reverse stock split at any time prior to the effective time of the reverse stock split if the Board determines that the reverse stock split is no longer in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders.

The proxy statement attached to this letter provides you with information about the proposed reverse stock split amendment. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully. You may obtain additional information about the Company from documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. Please submit your proxy as soon as possible even if you plan to attend the Special Meeting. We appreciate your continued ownership of Colfax shares and your support regarding this matter.

Sincerely

Matthew L. Trerotola

President and Chief Executive Officer


LOGO

Notice of 

Special Meeting 

of Stockholders 

Monday, May 13, 2019February 28, 2022

3:9:00 p.m. Locala.m. Eastern Time

Maryland Conference Center, 2720 Technology Drive, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701Via live webcast at

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM

To Our Stockholders:

Notice is hereby given that the 2019 Annuala Special Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual“Special Meeting”) of Colfax Corporation will be held via live webcast at the Maryland Conference Center located at 2720 Technology Drive, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM on Monday, May 13, 2019February 28, 2022 at 3:9:00 p.m., local time,a.m. Eastern Time, for the following purposes:

 

1.

To electapprove and adopt an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect (a) a reverse stock split of our common stock, at one of three reverse stock split ratios, one-for-two,one-for-three or one-for-four, with the nine members of theexact ratio to be determined by our Board of Directors named(the “Board”) at a later date, and (b) if and when the reverse stock split is effected, a corresponding reduction in the attached proxy statement;number of authorized shares of our common stock by the selected reverse stock split ratio (the “Reverse Stock Split Proposal”); and

2.

To ratifyapprove one or more adjournments of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;

3.To hold an advisory voteSpecial Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (“say-on-pay”); and
4.To consider any other matters that properly come beforeReverse Stock Split Proposal at the AnnualSpecial Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.adjournment(s) thereof (the “Adjournment Proposal”).

Even if the reverse stock split proposal is approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Board may delay or abandon the reverse stock split at any time prior to the effective time of the reverse stock split if the Board determines that the reverse stock split is no longer in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders.

The accompanying proxy statement describes the matters to be considered at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 26, 2019January 10, 2022 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the AnnualSpecial Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

We are pleased to take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules that allow us to furnish our proxy materials and our annual report to stockholders on the Internet. We believe that posting these materials on the Internet enables us to provide our stockholders with the information that they need more quickly while lowering our costs of printing and delivery and reducing the environmental impact of our AnnualSpecial Meeting.

Due to continuing concerns relating to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our stockholders, directors, officers, employees and other meeting attendees, the Special Meeting will be completely virtual. To attend, participate in, and vote during the Special Meeting, stockholders of record must go to the meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM and enter the control number found on their proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”). If you are a beneficial stockholder who owns common stock in street name, meaning through a bank, broker or other nominee, and your voting instruction form or Notice indicates that you may vote those shares through the http://www.proxyvote.com website, then you may attend, participate in, and vote during the Special Meeting using the 16-digit control number indicated on that voting instruction form or Notice. Otherwise, stockholders who hold their shares in street name should contact their bank, broker or other nominee and obtain a “legal proxy” in order to be able to attend, participate in or vote at the Special Meeting. A list of stockholders of record as of the Record Date will be available for inspection during ordinary business hours at our corporate headquarters located at 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808, for 10 days prior to the date of our Special Meeting. The list will also be available for inspection at the Special Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM.

As a stockholder of Colfax Corporation, your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting in person,virtually, we urge you to votesubmit your sharesproxy at your earliest convenience and thank you for your continued support of Colfax Corporation.

Dated:     April 2, 2019

, 2022

By Order of the Board of Directors

Curtis E. JewellBradley J. Tandy

Secretary


Table of Contents

 

PROXY SUMMARY

51
 

Proxy Statement for AnnualSpecial Meeting of Stockholders

8
 3 

PROPOSAL 1 REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AND AUTHORIZED SHARE REDUCTION

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS9
   
Director Qualifications 9
Nominees for Director10
4 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 12

Vote Required

11 
Director Independence12

Board of Directors and its CommitteesRecommendation

12
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation13
Identification of Director Candidates and Director Nomination Process14
Board Leadership Structure14
Board Evaluation Process14
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight15
Standards of Conduct15
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions16
Corporate Social Responsibility17
Contacting the Board of Directors17
11 
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION18

PROPOSAL 2 ADJOURNMENT OF SPECIAL MEETING

12 
PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM20

Vote Required

   
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services 20
Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures21
12 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT Board Recommendation

22
 12 
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS23

Executive Summary 

23
Determination of Executive Compensation and Performance Criteria 26
Elements of Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program 26
Back to Contents
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT 34
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION35
Summary Compensation Table 35
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 201837
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018 Fiscal Year-End 38
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal 201841
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation 42
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control45
CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE 46
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION 47
PROPOSAL 3APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS’ COMPENSATION, ON A NON-BINDING ADVISORY BASIS (“SAY-ON-PAY”)48
LOGO   BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK

4913
 
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE 51

LOGO   GENERAL MATTERS

15 
GENERAL MATTERS 52

Outstanding Stock and Voting Rights

5215

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations

5316

Delivery of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address

5316
Additional Information 54

Other Matters

5416

Annex A

A-1 
Back to Contents


PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. Page references are supplied to help you find further information in this proxy statement.

AnnualSpecial Meeting of Stockholders

 

Date and Time:

Monday, May 13, 2019February 28, 2022 at 3:9:00 pm EDTa.m., Eastern Time

Location:2720 Technology Drive, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701

Via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM

Record Date:March 26, 2019

January 10, 2022

 

Availability of Proxy Materials – Use of Notice and Access

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be Heldheld on May 13, 2019: Our Annual Report to Stockholders and this Proxy Statement areFebruary 28, 2022: This proxy statement is available atwww.proxyvote.comwww.proxyvote.com..

Pursuant to the “notice and access” rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, we have elected to provide stockholders access to our proxy materials primarily over the Internet. Accordingly, on or about April 2, 2019,January 19, 2022, we sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our stockholders entitled to vote at the AnnualSpecial Meeting as of the close of business on March 26, 2019,January 10, 2022, the record date of the meeting. The Notice includes instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a printed copy of these materials. In addition, by following the instructions in the Notice, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis.

Choosing to receive your future proxy materials by e-mail will save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the impact of our annual meetings on the environment. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail prior to our next yearannual meeting with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Who May Vote

You may vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on the March 26, 2019,January 10, 2022, the record date.

How to Cast Your Vote

You can vote or submit your proxy by any of the following methods:

 

LOGO

Via the internet (www.proxyvote.com) though May 12, 2019;through February 27, 2022;

LOGO 

By telephone (1-800-690-6903) though May 12, 2019; through February 27, 2022;

LOGO 

By completing, signing and returning your proxy by mail in the envelope provided or to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NJ 11717 by May 12, 2019;February 27, 2022; or

LOGO 

Via in personvirtual attendance and voting at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. To attend the Special Meeting, you must go to the meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM and enter your control number. Once admitted, you may vote by following the instructions available on the meeting website. If you are a beneficial stockholder of record,who owns shares in street name and have questions about your admission card will serve as proof of ownership. If you hold your shares through acontrol number or how to obtain one, please contact the bank, broker or other nominee you must bring proof of ownership and, to vote, a valid legal proxy from a stockholder of record.

who holds your shares.

If you are a beneficial stockholder who owns your shares in street name, the ability to provide your voting instructions online or by telephone may depend on the voting procedures of the organization that holds your shares.

 

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  
  5
LOGO  

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

1

Back to Contents


Voting Matters

We are asking you to vote on the following proposals at the AnnualSpecial Meeting:

 

ProposalBoard Vote RecommendationPage Reference

Proposal 1 – ElectionApproval of DirectorsReverse Stock Split and

  Authorized Share Reduction

FOR each director nominee9
Proposal 2 – Approval of AuditorAdjournmentFOR20
Proposal 3 – Say-on-PayFOR4812 

Board and Governance Highlights

Balanced Board tenure with new independent directors appointed in 2017 and 2016
Over three-fourths (75%) independent Board with two female directors
Stock ownership requirements for officers and directors
Anti-hedging, anti-pledging, and clawback policies

Board Nominees (page 10)

The following table provides summary information about each director nominee:

    Director     Committee  
Name Age Since Occupation Independent Memberships Other Public Boards
Mitchell P. Rales 62 1995 Chairman of the Board, Colfax Corporation   N/A Danaher Corporation; Fortive Corporation
      Chairman of the Executive Committee, Danaher Corporation      
Matthew L. Trerotola 51 2015 President and Chief Executive Officer, Colfax Corporation   N/A None
Patrick W. Allender 72 2008 Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Danaher Corporation   Nominating (Chair) Audit Brady Corporation; Diebold Nixdorf, Inc.
Thomas S. Gayner 57 2008 Co-Chief Executive Officer, Markel Corporation   Audit Markel Corporation; Cable One, Inc.; Graham Holdings, Inc.
Rhonda L. Jordan 61 2009 Former President, Kraft Foods Inc.   Compensation (Chair) Nominating Ingredion, Inc.
A. Clayton Perfall 60 2010 Operating Executive, Tailwind Capital   Audit (Chair) None
Didier Teirlinck 62 2017 Former Executive Vice President, Climate Segment, Ingersoll Rand   Audit None
Rajiv Vinnakota 48 2008 President, Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, effective July 1, 2019   Compensation Nominating None
Sharon Wienbar 57 2016 Former Venture Partner, Scale Venture Partners   Compensation Resideo Technologies, Inc.

In accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), to be elected each director nominee must receiveaffirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast with respect to that director’s election. Incumbent directors nominatedoutstanding shares of our common stock is required for election by the Board are required, as a condition to such nomination, to submit a conditional letter of resignation to the Chairmanapproval of the Board. InReverse Stock Split Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have the event that a nominee for director does not receivesame effect as votes against the Reverse Stock Split Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes castoutstanding shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the AnnualSpecial Meeting with respectand entitled to his or her election,vote on the Board will promptly consider whether to accept or reject the conditional resignation of that nominee, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will then take action and will publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it no later than 90 days following the certification of election results.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  6
Back to Contents

Auditor Ratification (page 20)

We ask our stockholders to approve the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firmmatter is required for the year ending December 31, 2019. Below is summary information about fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP for services provided in 2018approval of the Adjournment Proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the Adjournment Proposal and 2017:

Fee Category (fees in thousands) 2018  2017 
Audit Fees 5,827  5,790 
Audit-Related Fees     1,054 
Tax Fees  1,146   1,115 
All Other Fees  2   2 
TOTAL 6,975  8,001 

Executive Compensation (page 23)

We strive to create a compensation program for our associates, including our executives, that provides a compelling and engaging opportunity to attract, retain and motivatebroker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the best talent. We believe this results in performance-driven leadership that is aligned to achieve our financial and strategic objectives withoutcome of the intention to deliver superior long-term returns to our stockholders. Our compensation program includes the following key features:Adjournment Proposal.

 

We link rewards to performance and foster a team-based approach by setting clear objectives that, if achieved, we believe will contributed to our overall success;
  
LOGOWe emphasize long-term stockholder value creation by using stock options and performance-based restricted stock units, in combination with a stock ownership policy, to deliver long-term compensation incentives while minimizing risk-taking behaviors that could negatively affect long-term results;
  

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

We set Annual Incentive Plan operational and financial performance targets based on the results of our Board’s strategic planning process and corporate budget, and provide payouts that vary significantly from year-to-year based on the achievement of those targets; and
 
We believe the design of our overall compensation program, as well as our internal controls and policies, serve to limit excessive risk-taking behavior, as described further on page 32.

Say-on-Pay: Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers (page 48)

We are asking our stockholders to approve on an advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers. We believe our compensation programs and practices are appropriate and effective in implementing our compensation philosophy, and our focus remains on linking compensation to performance while aligning the interests of management with those of our stockholders.

 

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  

 

72


Back to Contents

Proxy Statement for AnnualSpecial Meeting of Stockholders

 

2019 Annual

 February 28, 2022 Special Meeting

 

We are furnishing this Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Colfax Corporation (hereinafter, “Colfax,” “we,” “us” and the “Company”) of proxies for use at the 2019 AnnualSpecial Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual“Special Meeting”) to be held on Monday, May 13, 2019,February 28, 2022, at 3:9:00 p.m. local time,a.m. Eastern Time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The Board has made this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of AnnualSpecial Meeting available on the Internet. We first made these materials available to the Company’s stockholders entitled to vote at the AnnualSpecial Meeting on or about April 2, 2019.January     , 2022.

The purpose of the Special Meeting is to consider and vote on the following proposals:

1.

To approve and adopt an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) to effect (a) a reverse stock split of our common stock, at one of three reverse stock split ratios, one-for-two,one-for-three or one-for-four, with an exact ratio to be determined by our Board at a later date (the “Reverse Stock Split”), and (b) if and when the Reverse Stock Split is effected, a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of our common stock by the selected Reverse Stock Split ratio (the “Authorized Share Reduction” and together with the Reverse Stock Split, the “Reverse Stock Split Proposal”); and

2.

To approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the Reverse Stock Split Proposal at the Special Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof (the “Adjournment Proposal”).

The Purpose of the Reverse Stock Split

Colfax intends to effect the reverse stock split and authorized share count reduction in connection with and immediately following the previously announced separation (the “Spin-off”) of its existing fabrication technology business, which will operate as ESAB Corporation (“ESAB”), and its specialty medical technology businesses, which will operate under the new name Enovis Corporation (“Enovis”). If the Spin-off is completed, then the market price and trading ranges of Enovis’s common stock will no longer reflect the value of the ESAB business. With a reverse stock split, the price of each common share is expected to increase so that a stockholder would have fewer but higher priced shares. A reverse stock split would not have any impact on the voting and other rights of stockholders, and would have no impact on the Company’s business operations or any of its outstanding indebtedness.

Even if the reverse stock split proposal is approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Board may delay or abandon the reverse stock split at any time prior to the effective time of the reverse stock split if the Board determines that the reverse stock split is no longer in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders.

 

About Colfax Corporation

 

Colfax Corporation is a leading diversified technology company that provides orthopedic, fabrication technology and air and gas handlingmedical technology products and services to customers around the world, principally under the DJO, ESAB and HowdenDJO (as defined below) brands. We have been built through a series of acquisitions and organic growth. We seek to build an enduring premier global enterprise by applying the Colfax Business System, a comprehensive set of tools and processes, to create superior value for customers, stockholders and associates, to continuously improve our company and pursue growth in revenues and improvements in profit and cash flow.

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

3


Proposal 1

Reverse Stock Split and

Authorized Share Reduction

 General

We are asking our stockholders to approve a series of three proposed amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction (the “Amendments”). Our businessBoard has unanimously approved and declared advisable the Amendments, and recommends that our stockholders approve and adopt the Amendments. The foregoing description of the Amendments is a summary and is subject to the full text of the Amendments, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A.

If our stockholders approve this proposal, the Board will determine the reverse stock split ratio from among the proposed ratios and cause a certificate of amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation setting forth the Amendment with the selected ratio (the “Certificate of Amendment”) to be filed with the Delaware Secretary of State to effect the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction only if the Board determines that the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction would be in the best interests of Colfax and its stockholders. The Board will abandon the other Amendments. The Board also may determine in its discretion not to effect the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction and abandon the Amendments, which means that the Certificate of Amendment will not be filed with the Delaware Secretary of State. Colfax will not affect the Reverse Stock Split without also effecting the Authorized Share Reduction, and vice versa. Subject to stockholder approval, the Board currently expects and intends to file the Certificate of Amendment to implement the Reverse Stock Split and Authorized Share Reduction such that they become effective immediately following the intended Spin-off transaction as described above. No further action on the part of stockholders will be required to either implement or abandon the Reverse Stock Split or the Authorized Share Reduction.

The Amendments, if effected, will effect a Reverse Stock Split of the outstanding shares of Colfax’s common stock at one of three Reverse Stock Split ratios, one-for-two,one-for-three or one-for-four, as shown in Amendment A, Amendment B and Amendment C, respectively, to the Certificate of Amendment that is attached as Annex A hereto, with an exact ratio to be determined by our Board, in its sole discretion, at a later date. As of December 31, 2021, 156,249,234 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. Based on such number of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, immediately following the effectiveness of the Reverse Stock Split (and without giving any effect to the payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares), we will have, depending on the Reverse Stock Split ratio selected by our Board, issued and outstanding shares of stock as illustrated in the table under the caption “—Effects of the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction—Effect on Shares of Common Stock.”

The Amendments, if effected, will also result in a corresponding reduction of the total number of shares of our common stock by the selected Reverse Stock Split ratio, as shown in Amendment A, Amendment B and Amendment C, respectively, to the Certificate of Amendment that is attached as Annex A hereto. See “—Effects of the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction—Effect on Shares of Common Stock” for the number of shares of common stock authorized but not outstanding or reserved that will remain available for issuance immediately following the effectiveness of the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction.

All holders of Colfax’s common stock will be affected proportionately by the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction.

No fractional shares of common stock will be issued as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. Instead, any stockholder who would have been entitled to receive a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split will receive cash payments in lieu of such fractional shares. Each stockholder will hold the same percentage of the outstanding common stock immediately following the Reverse Stock Split as that stockholder did immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split, except to the extent that the Reverse Stock Split results in stockholders receiving cash in lieu of fractional shares. The par value of our common stock will continue to be $0.001 per share (see “—Effects of the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction—Accounting Matters”).

 Background

We have been built through a series of acquisitions, as well as organic growth, since itsour founding in 1995.

Our January 2012 We seek to build an enduring premier global enterprise by applying the Colfax Business System to continuously improve our Company and pursue growth in revenues and improvements in profit and cash flow. On February 22, 2019, we completed our acquisition of Charter International plc transformed Colfax from a fluid handling business into a diversified industrial enterprise with a broad global footprint that encompassed fabrication technology (operating primarily under the ESAB brand name), fluid handling products, and air and gas handling products (operating principally under the Howden brand name). In the years following that acquisition, we completed 24 acquisitions to grow and strengthen our business across our three major business lines. In December 2017, we completed the divestiture of our fluid handling business. This represented a strategic milestone in the development and transformation of our business portfolio and strengthened our balance sheet, providing more flexibility to execute our strategic growth strategy. In November 2018, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DJO Global, Inc. (“DJO”) for $3.2 billion in cash. DJO is, a global developer, manufacturer and distributor of high-quality medical devices with a broad range of products used for orthopedic bracing, reconstructive implants, rehabilitation, pain management and physical therapy. This acquisition was completed in February 2019.DJO products address the high-margin orthopedic continuum of patient care from injury prevention to rehabilitation from injury or degenerative disease, enabling people to regain or maintain their natural motion.

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

4


We are currently a leading diversified technology company that provides fabrication technology and medical device products and services to customers around the world, principally under the ESAB and DJO brands. We conduct operations through two operating segments, “Fabrication Technology”, which incorporates the operations of ESAB and its related brands, and “Medical Technology”, which incorporates the operations of DJO and its related brands.

On March 4, 2021, we announced our intention to separate our fabrication technology and specialty medical technology businesses into two differentiated, independent, and publicly traded companies. We intend to enter into a Separation and Distribution Agreement, effective prior to the Spin-off (the “Separation Agreement”), with our wholly owned subsidiary, ESAB, which will hold our fabrication technology business. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, we expect to distribute all or a portion of the shares of common stock of ESAB owned as of the record date (as defined in the Separation Agreement) on a pro rata basis to the holders of our common stock. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, we expect to complete the Spin-off near the end of the first quarter of 2022 and immediately prior to the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split and Authorized Share Reduction. We cannot provide any assurance that the Separation Agreement will be entered into or that the spin-off will be completed, as it is subject to certain conditions precedent. Following the spin-off, we will continue to acquire attractive businesseshold our specialty medical technology business and will operate under the name Enovis Corporation. For additional details on the intended distribution, please see the preliminary Form 10 Registration Statements that we believeESAB will strengthenfile with the coreU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as may be amended from time to time in future filings.

We expect that the Spin-off will allow each company to: (1) improve both investor alignment with its clear value proposition and the ability for investors to value each company based on its distinct strategic, operational and financial characteristics; (2) tailor capital structure and allocation of ourcapital to its specific business profile and strategic priorities in the most efficient manner possible; (3) increase operating flexibility and resources to capitalize on growth opportunities in its respective markets; and (4) sharpen strategic focus in pursuit of its distinct operating priorities and strategies. The Spin-off would also provide each company with an appropriately valued acquisition currency that could be used for larger, transformational transactions.

We continue to make progress on the Spin-off and are targeting its completion near the end of the first quarter of 2022 and immediately prior to the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split and Authorized Share Reduction. Completion of the Spin-off is subject to, among other things, completion of financing and other transactions on satisfactory terms, other steps necessary to qualify the Spin-off as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, receipt of regulatory approvals, a favorable tax opinion and/or broadenInternal Revenue Service ruling and diversifyfinal approval from our portfolio.Board. There can be no assurance regarding the form and timing of the Spin-off or its completion. Details of the Spin-off will be included in future filings with the SEC.

 

Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction

Reverse Stock Split

The Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to reduce the number of issued and outstanding shares at one of three Reverse Stock Split ratios, one-for-two,one-for-three or one-for-four, with an exact ratio to be determined by the Board at a later date, through the Reverse Stock Split implemented in connection with and subsequent to the previously announced intended Spin-off. Immediately following the completion of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding will be reduced proportionately based on the selected reverse stock split ratio as determined by our Board at a later date.

The proposed Reverse Stock Split is in recognition of the fact that if the Spin-off is completed, then the market price and trading ranges of Enovis’s common stock will no longer reflect the value of the ESAB business. With a reverse stock split, the price of each common share is expected to increase so that a stockholder would have fewer but higher priced shares. A reverse stock split would not have any impact on the voting and other rights of stockholders, and would have no impact on the Company’s business operations or any of its outstanding indebtedness. Further, brokerage commissions, as a percentage of the total transaction, tend to be higher for lower-priced stocks. As discusseda result, certain investors may also be dissuaded from purchasing lower-priced stocks. A higher stock price after the Reverse Stock Split may reduce this concern.

Authorized Share Reduction

As a matter of Delaware law, the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split does not require a reduction in the total number of authorized shares of our annual reportcommon stock. However, if stockholders approve the Reverse Stock Split Proposal and the Reverse Stock Split is implemented, the authorized number of shares of our common stock also would be reduced by the corresponding, selected Reverse Stock Split ratio. The actual number of authorized shares after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, if implemented, will depend on Form 10-K, we seekthe Reverse Stock Split ratio that is ultimately determined by the Board. See the table set forth in the subsection entitled, “—Effects of the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction—Effect on Shares of Common Stock,” which shows the three possibilities for the number of authorized shares of common stock under each of the Reverse Stock Split ratios.

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

5


 Determination of the Reverse Stock Split Ratio

The ratio of the Reverse Stock Split, if approved and implemented, will be at one of three ratios, one-for-two,one-for-three or one-for-four, with an exact ratio to build an enduring premier global enterprisebe determined by applyingour Board at a later date. The Board believes that stockholder adoption of three alternatives of reverse stock split ratios (as opposed to adoption of a single reverse stock split ratio) provides maximum flexibility to achieve the Colfax Business System (“CBS”) to pursue growthpurposes of a Reverse Stock Split and, therefore, is in revenuesthe best interests of the Company. In determining a ratio following the receipt of stockholder adoption, the Board (or any authorized committee of the Board) may consider, among other things, factors such as:

the historical trading price and improvements in profittrading volume of our common stock;

the anticipated impact of the Spin-off on our trading price and cash flow. CBS istrading volume of our business management system. It is a repeatable, teachable process that we use to create superior valuecommon stock;

the number of shares of our common stock outstanding;

the then-prevailing market price and trading volume of our common stock and the anticipated impact of the Reverse Stock Split on the trading market for our customers, stockholders, and associates. Rooted in our core values, it is our culture. CBS provides common stock;

the tools and techniques to ensure that we are continuously improvinganticipated impact of the Reverse Stock Split on our ability to meet or exceed customer requirementsraise additional financing;

the anticipated impact of a particular ratio on a consistent basis.our ability to reduce administrative and transactional costs; and

prevailing general market and economic conditions.

 

Our principal executive officeCertain Risk Factors Associated With the Reverse Stock Split

We cannot assure you that the proposed Reverse Stock Split will increase our stock price.

We expect that the Reverse Stock Split will increase the per share trading price of our common stock. However, the effect of the Reverse Stock Split on the per share trading price of our common stock cannot be predicted with any certainty, and the history of reverse stock splits for other companies is locatedvaried, particularly since some investors may view a reverse stock split negatively. It is possible that the per share trading price of our common stock after the Reverse Stock Split will not increase in the same proportion as the reduction in the number of our outstanding shares of common stock following the Reverse Stock Split, and the Reverse Stock Split may not result in a per share trading price that would attract investors who do not trade in lower priced stocks. In addition, although we believe the Reverse Stock Split may enhance the marketability of our common stock to certain potential investors, we cannot assure you that, if implemented, our common stock will be more attractive to investors. Even if we implement the Reverse Stock Split, the per share trading price of our common stock may decrease due to factors unrelated to the Reverse Stock Split, including our future performance and the Spin-off. If the Reverse Stock Split is consummated and the per share trading price of the common stock declines, the percentage decline as an absolute number and as a percentage of our overall market capitalization may be greater than would occur in the absence of the Reverse Stock Split.

The proposed Reverse Stock Split may decrease the liquidity of our common stock.

The liquidity of our common stock may be negatively impacted by the Reverse Stock Split, given the reduced number of shares that would be outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split, particularly if the per share trading price does not increase as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. Accordingly, the Reverse Stock Split may not achieve the desired results as described above.

Effective Time

The effective time of the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction (the “Effective Time”), if approved by stockholders and implemented by Colfax, will be the time that the Certificate of Amendment is filed with the Delaware Secretary of State or at 420 National Business Parkway, 5thFloor, Annapolis Junction, MD, 20777. Our telephone numbersuch later time as specified in the Certificate of Amendment. It is (301) 323-9000expected that such filing will take place immediately after the completion of the intended Spin-off. However, the exact timing of the filing of the Certificate of Amendment will be determined by our Board based on its evaluation as to when such action will be the most advantageous to the Company and our websitestockholders.

If, at any time prior to the filing of the Certificate of Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State, notwithstanding stockholder approval and without further action by the stockholders, the Board, in its sole discretion, determines that it is locatedin Colfax’s best interests and the best

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

6


interests of Colfax’s stockholders to delay the filing of the Certificate of Amendment or abandon the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction, the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction may be delayed or abandoned.

Fractional Shares

Stockholders will not receive fractional shares of common stock in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Instead, the transfer agent will aggregate all fractional shares and sell them as soon as practicable after the Effective Time at the then-prevailing prices on the open market, on behalf of those stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. We expect that the transfer agent will conduct the sale in an orderly fashion at a reasonable pace and that it may take several days to sell all of the aggregated fractional shares of our common stock. After the transfer agent’s completion of such sale, stockholders who would have been entitled to a fractional share will instead receive a cash payment from the transfer agent in an amount equal to their respective pro rata shares of the total proceeds of that sale net of any brokerage costs incurred by the transfer agent to sell such stock.

Stockholders will not be entitled to receive interest for the period of time between the Effective Time and the date payment is made for their fractional share interest. You should also be aware that, under the escheat laws of certain jurisdictions, sums due for fractional interests that are not timely claimed after the funds are made available may be required to be paid to the designated agent for each such jurisdiction. Thereafter, stockholders otherwise entitled to receive such funds may have to obtain the funds directly from the state to which they were paid.

If you believe that you may not hold sufficient shares of our common stock at the Effective Time to receive at least one share in the Reverse Stock Split and you want to continue to hold Colfax’s common stock after the Reverse Stock Split, you may do so by either:

purchasing a sufficient number of shares of Colfax’s common stock; or

if you have shares of Colfax’s common stock in more than one account, consolidating your accounts;

in each case, so that you hold a number of shares of our common stock in your account prior to the Reverse Stock Split that would entitle you to receive at least one share of common stock in the Reverse Stock Split. Shares of our common stock held in registered form and shares of our common stock held in “street name” (that is, through a broker, bank or other holder of record) for the same stockholder will be considered held in separate accounts and will not be aggregated when effecting the Reverse Stock Split.

Effects of the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction

www.colfaxcorp.com.General

After the Effective Time, each stockholder will own a reduced number of shares of common stock. The principal effect of the Reverse Stock Split will be to proportionately decrease the number of outstanding shares of our common stock based on one of the three Reverse Stock Split ratios, one-for-two,one-for-three or one-for-four, with the exact ratio to be determined by our Board at a later date. The Authorized Share Reduction will reduce the authorized number of shares of our capital stock by the corresponding, selected Reverse Stock Split ratio that is ultimately determined by our Board.

Voting rights and other rights of the holders of our common stock will not be affected by the Reverse Stock Split, other than as a result of the treatment of fractional shares as described above. For example, a holder of 2% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock immediately prior to the effectiveness of the Reverse Stock Split will generally continue to hold 2% (assuming there is no impact as a result of the payment of cash in lieu of issuing fractional shares) of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock after the Reverse Stock Split. The number of stockholders of record will not be affected by the Reverse Stock Split (except to the extent any are cashed out as a result of holding fractional shares). If approved and implemented, the Reverse Stock Split may result in some stockholders owning “odd lots” of less than 100 shares of our common stock. Odd lot shares may be more difficult to sell, and brokerage commissions and other costs of transactions in odd lots are generally somewhat higher than the costs of transactions in “round lots” of even multiples of 100 shares. Our Board believes, however, that these potential effects are outweighed by the benefits of the Reverse Stock Split.

Effect on Common Stock

On December 30, 2021, the Board adopted resolutions (1) approving and declaring advisable a series of three alternative amendments of our Certificate of Amendment to effect, at the discretion of the Board, a reverse stock split at one of three Reverse Stock Split ratios, one-for-two,one-for-three or one-for-four, and contemporaneously with such Reverse Stock Split, to effect a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of common stock by the corresponding, selected Reverse Stock Split ratio that is ultimately determined by our Board, (2) directing that the Reverse Stock Split Proposal be submitted to the holders of our common stock for their

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

7


approval and (3) recommending that the holders of our common stock approve the Reverse Stock Split Proposal. The actual number of authorized shares of our common stock after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, if and when effected, will depend on the Reverse Stock Split ratio that is ultimately determined by our Board. The following table contains approximate information, based on share information as of December 31, 2021, relating to our outstanding common stock and information regarding our authorized shares for each of the three alternative amendments:

                                           

Number of Shares of

Common Stock

Authorized

  

Number of Shares of

Common Stock Issued

and Outstanding

Pre-Reverse Stock Split

  400,000,000  156,249,234

Post-Reverse Stock Split 1:2

  200,000,000  78,124,617

Post-Reverse Stock Split 1:3

  133,333,333  52,083,078

Post-Reverse Stock Split 1:4

  100,000,000  39,062,309

After the Effective Time, our common stock would have a new committee on uniform securities identification procedures, or CUSIP number, a number used to identify our common stock.

Our common stock tradesis currently registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and we are subject to the periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act. The Reverse Stock Split will not affect the registration of our common stock under the Exchange Act or the listing of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)(“NYSE”). Following the Reverse Stock Split, the Spin-off transaction and our name change to Enovis Corporation, our common stock will continue to trade on the NYSE under the symbol CFX.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  8
Proposal 1Election of Directors

Nine director nominees“ENOV” and will be elected atassigned a new CUSIP number.

Effect on Preferred Stock

Pursuant to our Certificate of Incorporation, our authorized capital stock consists of 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share. The proposed Certificate of Amendment to effect the Annual Meeting, each to serve untilReverse Stock Split and the next annual meetingAuthorized Share Reduction would not impact the total authorized number of shares of preferred stock or the par value of the Companypreferred stock. There are currently no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

Accounting Matters

The Reverse Stock Split will not affect the common stock capital account on our balance sheet and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. At the recommendationpar value of our common stock will remain unchanged. The stated capital component, which consists of the Nominatingpar value per share of our common stock multiplied by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock issued and Corporate Governance Committee,outstanding, will be reduced in proportion to the size of the Reverse Stock Split, subject to a minor adjustment in respect of the treatment of fractional shares, and the additional paid-in capital account will be increased by the amount by which the stated capital is reduced. Our stockholders’ equity, in the aggregate, will remain unchanged. Immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, the per share net income or loss and net book value of our common stock will be increased, as compared to the per share amounts absent the Reverse Stock Split, because there will be fewer shares of common stock outstanding. All historic and per share amounts in our financial statements and related footnotes (for periods after the Reverse Stock Split and, on a pro forma basis, for periods prior to the Reverse Stock Split) will be restated to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.

Effect on Colfax’s Stock Incentive Plans

As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately 3,660,646 shares subject to stock options and 1,718,449 shares subject to unvested restricted stock units (including performance-based restricted stock units) outstanding under our stock incentive plans.

If the Reverse Stock Split is effected, the number of shares available for issuance under our stock incentive plans, as well as the number of shares subject to any outstanding award and the exercise price, grant price or purchase price relating to any such award under our stock incentive plans, are expected to be equitably adjusted by our Board has nominatedto reflect the following personsReverse Stock Split. Further, any fractional shares resulting from such adjustment are expected to servebe eliminated by rounding downward to the nearest whole share.

For illustrative purposes only, if a one-for-four reverse stock split is effected, the 2,590,182 shares that remain available for issuance under our 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan as directorsof December 31, 2021, are expected to be adjusted to 647,546 shares, subject to increase as and when outstanding awards made under the plan expire or are forfeited or are otherwise again made available for issuance pursuant to the term beginningterms of the plan. Further, for illustrative purposes only, if a one-for-four reverse stock split is effected, we expect that an outstanding stock option for 10,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $40.00 per share, would be adjusted as a result of the Annual Meeting on May 13, 2019: Mitchell P. Rales, Matthew L. Trerotola, Patrick W. Allender, Thomas S. Gayner, Rhonda L. Jordan, A. Clayton Perfall, Didier Teirlinck, Rajiv Vinnakota, and Sharon Wienbar. All nominees are currently serving on the Board.

Director Qualifications

Nominating Committee Criteriaone-for-four split ratio into an option exercisable for Board Members

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, among other things, the following criteria in selecting and reviewing director nominees:2,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $160.00 per share.

 

personal and professional integrity;
LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

8


No Dissenter’s Rights

Neither Delaware law, the Certificate of Incorporation, nor the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) provides for appraisal or other similar rights for dissenting stockholders in connection with this proposal. Accordingly, if the proposed amendments are authorized by our stockholders at the Special Meeting, our stockholders will have no right to dissent to the Reverse Stock Split or obtain payment for their shares (other than with respect to fractional shares, as described above), and we will not independently provide stockholders with any such right.

No Going Private Transaction

Notwithstanding the decrease in the number of outstanding shares following the proposed Reverse Stock Split, our Board does not intend for this transaction to be the first step in a “going private transaction” within the meaning of Rule 13e-3 of the Exchange Act.

Shares Held in Book-Entry and Through a Broker, Bank or Other Holder of Record

If you hold registered shares of our common stock in book-entry form, you do not need to take any action to receive your post-Reverse Stock Split shares of our common stock in registered book-entry form or your cash payment in lieu of fractional shares, if applicable. If you are entitled to post-Reverse Stock Split shares of our common stock, a transaction statement will automatically be sent to your address of record as soon as practicable after the Effective Time indicating the number of shares of our common stock you hold. In addition, if you are entitled to a payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares, a check will be mailed to you at your registered address as soon as practicable after the Effective Time. By signing and cashing this check, you will warrant, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that you owned the shares of Colfax’s common stock for which you received a cash payment.

At the Effective Time, we intend to treat stockholders holding shares of our common stock in “street name” (that is, through a broker, bank or other holder of record) in the same manner as registered stockholders whose shares of our common stock are registered in their names. Brokers, banks or other holders of record will be instructed to effect the Reverse Stock Split for their beneficial holders holding shares of our common stock in “street name”; however, these brokers, banks or other holders of record may apply their own specific procedures for processing the Reverse Stock Split. If you hold your shares of our common stock with a broker, bank or other holder of record, and you have any questions in this regard, we encourage you to contact your holder of record.

If you hold any of your shares of our common stock in certificate form, you will receive a transmittal letter from our transfer agent as soon as practicable after the Effective Time. The transmittal letter will be accompanied by instructions specifying how you can exchange your certificate representing the pre-Reverse Stock Split shares of our common stock for either: (1) a certificate representing the post-Reverse Stock Split shares of our common stock or (2) post-Reverse Stock Split shares of our common stock in a book-entry form, evidenced by a transaction statement that will be sent to your address of record as soon as practicable after the Effective Time indicating the number of shares of our common stock you hold, in each case together with any payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares to which you are entitled. Beginning on the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split, each certificate representing pre-Reverse Stock Split shares of our common stock will be deemed for all corporate purposes to evidence ownership of post-Reverse Stock Split shares. If you are entitled to a payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares, payment will be made as described under “—Fractional Shares.”

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following discussion is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders (as defined below) of the Reverse Stock Split, but does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax effects. The effects of other U.S. federal tax laws, such as estate and gift tax laws, and any applicable state, local or foreign tax laws are not discussed. This discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial decisions, and published rulings and administrative pronouncements of the IRS, in each case in effect as of the date hereof. These authorities may change or be subject to differing interpretations. Any such change or differing interpretation may be applied retroactively in a manner that could adversely affect a U.S. Holder. We have not sought and do not currently intend to seek any rulings from the IRS regarding the matters discussed below. There can be no assurance the IRS or a court will not take a contrary position to that discussed below regarding the tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split.

This discussion is limited to U.S. Holders that hold our common stock as a “capital asset” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address all U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to a U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, including the impact of the alternative minimum tax, the Medicare contribution tax on net investment income or any item of gross income with respect to our common stock being taken into account in an “applicable financial statement” (as defined in the Code). In addition, it does not address consequences relevant to Non-U.S. Holders subject to special rules, including, without limitation:

persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;

 

skills, business experience and industry knowledge useful to the oversight of the Company based on the perceived needs of the Company and the Board at any given time;
LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

9


persons holding our common stock as part of a hedge, straddle or other risk reduction strategy or as part of a conversion transaction or other integrated investment;

banks, insurance companies and other financial institutions;

real estate investment trusts and registered investment companies;

brokers, dealers or traders in securities;

corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax;

S corporations, partnerships or other entities or arrangements treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes (and investors therein);

tax-exempt organizations or governmental organizations;

persons deemed to sell our common stock under the constructive sale provisions of the Code;

persons who hold or receive our common stock pursuant to the exercise of any employee stock option or otherwise as compensation; and

tax-qualified retirement plans.

If a partnership (including an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will depend on the status of the partner, the activities of the partnership and certain determinations made at the partner level. Accordingly, partnerships holding our common stock and the partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split to them.

THIS DISCUSSION IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TAX ADVICE. INVESTORS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT ARISING UNDER THE U.S. FEDERAL ESTATE OR GIFT TAX LAWS OR UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR NON-U.S. TAXING JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE INCOME TAX TREATY.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our common stock that for U.S. federal income tax purposes is, or is treated as:

an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

a corporation created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or

a trust that (i) is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and the control of one or more United States persons (within the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code) or (ii) has a valid election in effect to be treated as a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The Reverse Stock Split is intended to qualify as a “recapitalization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the remainder of this discussion assumes that the Reverse Stock Split so qualifies. A U.S. Holder generally should not recognize gain or loss upon the Reverse Stock Split, except with respect to cash received in lieu of a fractional share of our common stock, as discussed below. A U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in the shares of our common stock received pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split should equal the aggregate tax basis of the shares of our common stock surrendered (excluding any portion of such basis that is allocated to any fractional share of our common stock), and such U.S. Holder’s holding period in the shares of our common stock received should include the holding period in the shares of our common stock surrendered. Treasury Regulations provide detailed rules for allocating the tax basis and holding period of the shares of our common stock surrendered to the shares of our common stock received pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split. U.S. Holders who acquired shares of our common stock on different dates and at different prices should consult their tax advisors regarding the allocation of the tax basis and holding period of such shares.

A U.S. Holder that receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of our common stock pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split should recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash received and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the shares of our common stock surrendered that is allocated to such fractional share of our common stock. Such capital gain or loss should be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for our common stock surrendered exceeds one year at the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

A U.S. Holder may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding when such holder receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of our common stock pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split. Certain U.S. Holders are exempt from backup withholding, including corporations and certain tax-exempt organizations. A U.S. Holder will be subject to backup withholding if such holder is not otherwise exempt and:

 

the ability and willingness to devote the required amount of time to the Company’s affairs, including attendance at Board and committee meetings;

the interest, capacity and willingness to serve the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders; andLOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

10

the lack of any personal or professional relationships that would adversely affect a candidate’s ability to serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Pursuant


the holder fails to its charter,furnish the Nominatingholder’s taxpayer identification number, which for an individual is ordinarily his or her social security number;

the furnishes an incorrect taxpayer identification number;

the applicable withholding agent is notified by the IRS that the holder previously failed to properly report payments of interest or dividends; or

the holder fails to certify under penalties of perjury that the holder has furnished a correct taxpayer identification number and Corporate Governance Committee also reviews, among other qualifications,that the perspective, broad business judgment and leadership, business creativity and vision, and diversity of potential directors, all inIRS has not notified the context ofholder that the needs ofholder is subject to backup withholding.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the Board at that time. We believe that Board membership should reflect diversity in its broadest sense, including persons diverse in geography, gender, and ethnicity, and we seek independent directors who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions.

The charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee affirmatively recognizes diversity as one of the criteria for consideration in the selection of director nominees, and in its deliberations and discussions concerning potential director appointments the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has paid particular attention to diversity together with all other qualifying attributes. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually considers its effectiveness in achieving these objectivesbackup withholding rules may be allowed as a part of its assessment ofrefund or a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the overall composition of the Board and as part of the annual Board evaluation process described further below, which includes a director skills matrix to identify areas of director knowledge and experience that may benefit the Board in the future. Thatrequired information is used as a part of the director search and nomination process. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee looks for candidates with the expertise, skills, knowledge and experience that, when taken together with that of other members of the Board, will lead to a Board that is effective, collegial and responsivetimely furnished to the needs of the Company. As further discussed below, certain members of our Board have experience with the business systems that areIRS. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding their qualification for an integral part of our Company culture. In addition, we feel that the familiarity of certain Board members with our business systemexemption from their work experiences at Danaher Corporation and at our Company, combined with strong input from varied and sophisticated business backgrounds, provides us with a Board that is both functional and collegial while able to draw on a broad range of expertise in the consideration of complex issues.

Board Member Service

The biographies of each of the nominees below contain information regarding the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committeebackup withholding and the Board considered in determining that the person should serve as a director of the Company. The Board has been informed that all of the nominees listed below are willing to serve as directors, but if any of them should decline or be unable to act as a director, the individuals named in the proxies may voteprocedures for a substitute designated by the Board. The Company has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve.obtaining such an exemption.

In determining to nominate Mr. Gayner for re-election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board carefully evaluated and took into account that Mr. Gayner serves as an executive officer at Markel Corporation and serves on the boards of Markel Corporation, Graham Holdings Co. and Cable One Inc. (which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Graham Holdings until July 2015). The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determined, and the Board concurred, that Mr. Gayner is a valuable, productive and fully engaged director who should be re-elected to the Board. In reaching this conclusion, the Nominating and Governance Corporate Committee took note of Mr. Gayner’s stellar attendance record and role on our Board (Mr. Gayner attended all meetings of the Board and the Committees’ on which he served during 2018 and is an active participant in all Colfax Board matters), that Mr. Gayner is well-prepared for and participates actively in Board and Committee meetings, and that he brings unique experience and vision to our Board as a preeminent value investor and strategic leader from his position at Markel. Based on these factors, Mr. Gayner was unanimously recommended and re-nominated for election to our Board of Directors.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  9

Nominees for DirectorVote Required

The names of the nominees for director, their ages as of March 26, 2019, principal occupations, employment and other public company board service during at least the last five years, periods of service as a director of the Company, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee are set forth below:

MITCHELL P. RALES

Director Since 1995
Age 62

Mitchell P. Ralesis a co-founder of Colfax and has served as a director of the Company since its founding in 1995. He is the Chairman of our Board of Directors. Mr. Rales is a co-founder and has served as a member of the board of directors of Danaher Corporation, a global science and technology company, since 1983 and as Chairman of Danaher’s Executive Committee since 1984, and is also a member of the Fortive Corporation board of directors, which is a diversified industrial growth company that was spun-off from Danaher in 2016. He has been a principal in a number of private business entities with interests in manufacturing companies and publicly traded securities for over 25 years. Mr. Rales was instrumental in the founding of our Company and has played a key leadership role on our Board since that time. He helped create the Danaher Business System, on which the Colfax Business System is modeled, and has provided critical strategic guidance to the Company during its development and growth. In addition, as a result of Mr. Rales��� substantial ownership stake in our Company, he is well-positioned to understand, articulate and advocate for the rights and interests of the Company’s stockholders.

MATTHEW L. TREROTOLA

Director Since 2015
Age 51

Matthew L. Trerotolahas been our President and Chief Executive Office and has served as a director of the Company since July 2015. Prior to joining Colfax, Mr. Trerotola was an Executive Vice President and a member of DuPont’s Office of the Chief Executive, responsible for DuPont’s Electronics & Communications and Safety & Protection segments. Mr. Trerotola also had corporate responsibility for DuPont’s Asia-Pacific business. Many of Mr. Trerotola’s roles at DuPont, a global chemical company that is now part of DowDupont, involved applying innovation to improve margins and accelerate organic growth in global businesses. Prior to rejoining DuPont in 2013, Mr. Trerotola had served in leadership roles at Danaher since 2007, and was most recently Vice President and Group Executive for Life Sciences. Previously, Mr. Trerotola was Group Executive for Product Identification from 2009 to 2012, and President of the Videojet business from 2007 to 2009. While at McKinsey & Company from 1995 to 1999, Mr. Trerotola focused primarily on helping industrial companies accelerate growth. Mr. Trerotola’s day-to-day leadership of Colfax, combined with his significant international business experience and familiarity with the Danaher Business System, gives the Board an invaluable Company-focused perspective supplemented by his global operational expertise.

PATRICK W. ALLENDER

Director Since 2008
Age 72

Patrick W. Allenderhas served as a director of the Company since May 13, 2008. He is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Danaher Corporation, where he served from 1987 until his retirement in 2007. Prior to joining Danaher, Mr. Allender was an audit partner with a large international accounting firm. Mr. Allender is a director of Brady Corporation, where he is a member of the audit and corporate governance committees and the chairman of the finance committee, and a director of Diebold Nixdorf, Inc., where he is a member of the board finance committee and chairman of the audit committee. Mr. Allender’s prior experience as the Chief Financial Officer of a publicly traded company provides him with substantial expertise in financial reporting and risk management. In addition, his familiarity with the Danaher Business System provides targeted insight on the nature of the Company’s operations to the Board.

THOMAS S. GAYNER

Director Since 2008
Age 57

Thomas S. Gaynerhas served as a director of the Company since May 13, 2008. He is Co-Chief Executive Officer of Markel Corporation, a financial holding company whose principal business markets and underwrites specialty insurance products. Since 1990, Mr. Gayner has served as President of Markel Gayner Asset Management, Inc. Mr. Gayner has served as a director of Markel Corporation since August 2016 and previously served on the Markel Corporation board from 1998 to 2003. Mr. Gayner also currently serves on the board of directors of Graham Holdings Company and Cable One, Inc, as well as a director of The Davis Series Funds. Through his experience and investment knowledge with the Markel Corporation as well as his service on the boards and committees of other publicly traded companies, Mr. Gayner brings extensive leadership, financial acumen and public company expertise to our Board.

RHONDA L. JORDAN

Director Since 2009
Age 61

Rhonda L. Jordanhas served as a director of the Company since February 17, 2009. She served as President, Global Health & Wellness, and Sustainability for Kraft Foods Inc. until 2012 and in that role led the development of Kraft’s health & wellness and sustainability strategies and plans for the company, including marketing, product development, technology, alliances and acquisitions. Prior to being named President, Health & Wellness in 2010, she was the President of the Cheese and Dairy business

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  10

unit of Kraft. From 2006 to 2008 she served as the President of the Grocery business unit of Kraft and from 2004 to 2005 she was the Senior Vice President, Global Marketing of Kraft Cheese and Dairy. Ms. Jordan is a director of Ingredion Incorporated, where she is a chair of the compensation committee, and the private companies Bush Brothers & Company and G&L Holdings. Ms. Jordan’s management and operations experience within a large, global corporation gives her an important strategic voice in Board deliberations, and her knowledge and decision making with respect to business unit development and sustainable top-line performance makes her a valued member of our Board.

A. CLAYTON PERFALL

Director Since 2010
Age 60

A. Clayton Perfallhas served as a director of the Company since September 21, 2010. He is currently an Operating Executive of Tailwind Capital, a private equity fund manager focused on growing middle market companies in the healthcare and business & communications services sectors. He previously served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Archway Marketing Services, Inc., a provider of marketing logistics and fulfillment services, from 2008 through 2013. From 2001 until 2008 Mr. Perfall served as the Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the board of directors of AHL Services, Inc. Mr. Perfall also served as the Chief Executive Officer of Union Street Acquisition Corp. from 2006 until 2008. He served as the Chief Financial Officer of Snyder Communications, Inc. from 1996 until 2000 and was previously a partner with a large international accounting firm. Mr. Perfall currently serves on the boards of directors of the private companies Tailwind Premier Holdings, LLC and Distinct Holdings Group, LLC and previously served on the boards of directors of Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. from 2004 to 2018 Archway Marketing Services, Inc. from 2008 until 2013, RT Acquisition Corp. from 2012 until 2015 and inVentiv Health, Inc. from 1999 to 2010. He served as the audit committee chairman for Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc. and InVentiv Health during his time on those boards. Mr. Perfall’s significant financial expertise and experience as an audit committee chairman and public company Chief Financial Officer, combined with his substantial executive leadership background, are assets to both our Board and our Audit Committee.

DIDIER TEIRLINCK

Director Since 2017
Age 62

Didier Teirlinckhas served as a director of the Company since September 18, 2017. He retired from rom Ingersoll Rand, a diversified industrial manufacturing company, in September 2018. He has been a strategic advisor to the CEO of Ingersoll Rand since 2017, and previously served from November 2013 as executive vice president for Ingersoll Rand’s Climate segment, overseeing climate businesses around the world and enhancing competitive position and market share. After joining Ingersoll Rand in 2005, Mr. Teirlinck served as president of Climate Control in Europe before becoming President of the global Climate Solutions sector in 2009. Before joining Ingersoll Rand, he was President of Volvo Construction Equipment’s Compact Business Line worldwide and was previously general manager of DANISCO Flexible Group for southern Europe. Mr. Teirlinck’s international operating history and wealth of knowledge in the climate sector brings key geographic and market experience to our Board.

RAJIV VINNAKOTA

Director Since 2008
Age 48

Rajiv Vinnakotahas served as a director of the Company since May 13, 2008. He will be the President of the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, effective July 1, 2019. From 2015 to September 2018 he was an Executive Vice-President at the Aspen Institute, leading a division focused on youth & engagement. Prior to this role, Mr. Vinnakota was the Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of The SEED Foundation, a non-profit educational organization, at which he served from 1997-2015. Mr. Vinnakota was the chairman of The SEED Foundation board from 1997 until 2006. Prior to co-founding SEED, Mr. Vinnakota was an associate at Mercer Management Consulting. He was also a trustee of Princeton University from 2004 until 2007 and a member of the Executive Committee of the Princeton University board of directors from 2006 to 2007, and he served as the national chairman of Annual Giving at Princeton from 2007 until 2009. Mr. Vinnakota’s management experience, combined with his experience in the non-profit sector, brings a valuable perspective to our Board.

SHARON WIENBAR

Director Since 2016
Age 57

Sharon Wienbarhas served as a director of the Company since June 15, 2016. She was previously with Scale Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, from 2001 to 2018, where she led investments in technology companies and served on the board of numerous portfolio businesses. She was also a strategy consultant to Capella Education Company after they acquired Hackbright Academy, a leading software engineering training company for women, where she was the CEO from 2015-2016. Ms. Wienbar currently serves on the boards of Resideo Technology, a New York Stock Exchange-listed public company, and True Anthem, a privately held software provider. She previously served on other public and private boards, including the board of Everyday Health, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed public company, until its acquisition in December 2016. Prior to her venture capital career, Ms. Wienbar was an executive in several software companies and a consultant at Bain & Company. Ms. Wienbar’s leadership of technology investments, deep understanding of innovation drivers, and business acumen bring an important perspective to our Board.

VOTE REQUIRED

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes castoutstanding shares of our common stock is required for electionthe approval of each director.the amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction. If you abstain from voting on the Reverse Stock Split Proposal, your shares will not be counted as in attendance at the Special Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum or as having been voted on that matter and will therefore have the same effect as a vote “against” the proposal.

BOARD RECOMMENDATIONBoard Recommendation

 

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote“FOR”FORthe election of each of the nominees for director listed above.

Proposal 1.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  11

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a majority of our Board members be “independent” under the NYSE’s listing standards. In addition, the respective charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee require that each member of these committees be “independent” under the NYSE’s listing standards and, with respect to the Audit Committee, under the applicable SEC rules. In order for a director to qualify as “independent,” our Board must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company that would impair the director’s independence. Our Board undertook its annual review of director independence in February 2019. The Board has determined that Mr. Allender, Mr. Gayner, Ms. Jordan, Mr. Perfall, Mr. Teirlinck, Mr. Vinnakota, and Ms. Wienbar each qualify as “independent” under the NYSE’s listing standards. In reaching a determination on these directors’ independence, the Board considered that neither the directors nor their immediate family members have within the past three years had any direct or indirect business or professional relationships with the Company other than in their capacity as directors.

The independent members of our Board must hold at least two “executive session” meetings each year without the presence of management. If the Chair of the Board is not an independent director, the independent directors select an independent director to serve as Chairperson for each executive session. In general, the meetings of independent directors are intended to be used as a forum to discuss such topics as they deem necessary or appropriate. Mr. Allender serves as the presiding director of the independent director executive sessions and as such leads the independent directors during these sessions.

Board of Directors and its Committees

The Board and its committees meet regularly throughout the year, and may also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time. The Board held a total of thirteen meetings during the year ended December 31, 2018, including five regularly scheduled meetings and eight special meetings. In aggregate, during this time our directors attended over 95% of our Board meetings and meetings of the committees of the Board on which such directors served. During 2018, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which such director served. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines request Board members to make every effort to attend our annual meeting of stockholders. All directors then serving attended our annual meeting of stockholders in 2018.
LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

    

11


Proposal 2Adjournment of Special Meeting

The Board has approved the submission to the stockholders of a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on the Company’s website atwww.colfaxcorp.comon the Investors page under the Corporate Governance tab. These materials also are available in printproposal to any stockholder upon request to: Corporate Secretary, Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701. The Board committees review their respective charters on an annual basis. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees an annual evaluationapprove one or more adjournments of the Board and each committee’s operations and performance.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee met nine times during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Audit Committee is responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes, the audits of our financial statements, the qualifications of our independent registered public accounting firm, and the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the qualitative aspects of our financial reporting, our processes to manage business and financial risks, and our compliance with significant applicable legal, ethical and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. The members of our Audit Committee are Mr. Perfall, Chair, Mr. Allender, Mr. Gayner, and Mr. Teirlinck. The Board has determined that each of Mr. Perfall and Mr. Allender qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined under the SEC rules. The Board has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is independent and financially literate under the NYSE’s listing standards and that each member of our Audit Committee is independent under the standards of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  12

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met five times during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending candidates for election to the Board. In making its recommendations, the committee will review a candidate’s qualifications and any potential conflicts of interest and assess contributions of current directors in connection with his or her renomination. The committee is also responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for making recommendations to the Board or otherwise acting with respect to corporate governance policies and practices, including Board size and membership qualifications, new director orientation, committee structure and membership, related person transactions, and communications with stockholders and other interested parties. The members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Mr. Allender, Chair, Ms. Jordan and Mr. Vinnakota. The Board has determined that each member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent under the NYSE’s listing standards.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee met seven times during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Compensation Committee is responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for determining and approving the compensation and benefits of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, monitoring compensation arrangements applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in light of their performance, effectiveness and other relevant considerations and adopting and administering our equity and incentive plans. The members of our Compensation Committee are Ms. Jordan, Chair, Mr. Vinnakota, and Ms. Wienbar. The Board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, a “non-employee director” within the meaning of SEC Rule 16b-3, and is independent under the NYSE’s listing standards for directors and compensation committee members.

The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluates his performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determines his compensation level based on that analysis. The Compensation Committee also annually reviews and approves all elements of the compensation of our other executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer plays a significant role in developing and assessing achievement against the goals and objectives for other executive officers and makes compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee based on these evaluations. The Compensation Committee also administers all of the Company’s incentive compensation plans and equity-based compensation plans. The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding compensation of all executive officer hires, all elements of director compensation, and for adoption or certain amendments to incentive or equity-based compensation plans. The Compensation Committee also assists the Board in its oversight of risk related to the Company’s compensation policies and practices applicable to all Colfax associates. For further information on our compensation practices, including a description of our processes and procedures for determining compensation, the scope of the Compensation Committee’s authority and management’s role in compensation determinations, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, which begins on page 23.

Since April 2009, our Compensation Committee has engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co. as its independent compensation consultant to, among other things, formulate an appropriate peer group to be used by the Compensation Committee and to provide competitive comparison data and for other compensation consulting services as requested by the Compensation Committee. Additional information on the nature of the information and services provided by this independent compensation consultant can be found below in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee is or has ever been an officer or an employee of the CompanySpecial Meeting or any of its subsidiaries, and no Compensation Committee member has any interlocking or insider relationship with the Company which is required to be reported under the rules of the SEC.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  13

Identification of Director Candidates and Director Nomination Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by its members and other Board members, as well as by management and stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also use outside consultants to assistadjournment(s) thereof in identifying candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assessing whether a candidate may qualify as an independent director. Each possible candidate is discussed and evaluated in detail before being recommended to the Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends, and the Board nominates, candidates to stand for election as directors. Stockholders may nominate persons to be elected as directors and, as noted above, may suggest candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. If a stockholder wishes to suggest a person to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration as a director candidate, he or she must provide the same information as required of a stockholder who intends to nominate a director pursuant to the procedures contained in Section 3.3 of our Bylaws, in accordance with the same deadlines applicable to director nominations, as described below under “General Matters—Stockholder Proposals and Nominations.”

Board Leadership Structure

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines specify that the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer shall be held by separate persons. We believe that this structure is appropriate given the differences between the two roles in our current management structure. Our Chief Executive Officer, among other duties, is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman of our Board, among other responsibilities, provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer, takes an active role in setting the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board. Our current Chairman, Mr. Rales, is not an independent director and, as noted above in “Director Independence,” Mr. Allender serves as the presiding director for independent director executive sessions and as such leads the independent directors during these sessions.

Board Evaluation Process

The Board and its Committees conduct self-assessments annually at their February meetings. The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the process. The annual evaluation procedure is summarized below.

Action and TimeframeDescription
Preparation – November/DecemberEach director receives draft materials for the annual evaluation of (i) the Board’s performance and(ii) the performance of his or her committee(s). The materials include the Board and committeeself-assessment questionnaires. In advance of the assessment, questions are revised andsupplemented based on the input received from the Board members and, prior to distribution,the Chair of the Nominating Committee leads a final review in the December Board andcommittee meetings.
Assessment – December/JanuaryEach director is asked to consider a list of questions to assist with the evaluation of the Boardand its committees, covering topics such as Board composition, the conduct and effectivenessof meetings, quality of discussions, roles and responsibilities, quality and quantity of informationprovided, and other opportunities for improvement.
Review and Discussion – FebruaryThe Board and the committees thereof receive a report summarizing the annual evaluations aswell as a year-over-year comparison. The reports are distributed for consideration in advanceof and discussed at the February Board meeting. The committee chairs report to the Boardon their respective committee evaluations, noting any actionable items. Past evaluations haveaddressed a wide range of topics such as Board materials, director education and on-boarding,and allocation of meeting times.
Actionable Items and Follow-Up – OngoingThe Board and committees address any actionable items throughout the year, including a mid-yearcheck-in and end of year assessment against the actionable items identified in February.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  14

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board maintains responsibility for oversight of risks that may affect the Company. The Board discharges this duty primarily through its standing committees and also considers risk in its strategic planning for the Company and in its consideration of acquisitions. The Board engages in discussions about risk at each quarterly meeting, where it receives reports from its committees, as applicable, about the risk oversight activities within their respective areas of responsibility. Specifically, the Audit Committee (i) receives reports from and discusses with management, our internal audit team, and our independent registered public accounting firm all major risk exposures (whether financial, operating or otherwise), (ii) reviews the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and enterprise risk management, including with respect to cybersecurity risks, and (iii) oversees compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and our ethics program, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the corporate governance principles and governance structures that contribute to successful risk oversight and management. The Compensation Committee oversees certain risks associated with compensation policies and practices, as discussed below.

The Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees each make full reports to the Board of Directors at each regularly scheduled meeting regarding each committee’s considerations and actions, and risk considerations are presented to and discussed with the Board by management as part of strategic planning sessions and when considering potential acquisitions.

Standards of Conduct

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Pledging

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which set forth a framework to assist the Board in the exercise of its responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Guidelines cover, among other things, the composition and certain functions of the Board and its committees, executive sessions, Board responsibilities, expectations for directors, director orientation and continuing education, and our policy prohibiting pledging.

In February 2014, the Board amended the Corporate Governance Guidelines to prohibit any future pledging of Colfax’s common stock as security under any obligation by our directors and executive officers. The Board excepted from the policy shares of Colfax common stock that were already pledged at the time the policy was adopted, but any additional share pledges are prohibited. Pledged shares of Colfax common stock do not count toward our stock ownership requirements.

Certain shares of common stock owned by Mitchell Rales, Chairman of our Board, that were pledged at the time that the policy was adopted were grandfathered from the policy. Notwithstanding that the existing pledge was grandfathered under our policy, as part of its risk oversight function the Audit Committee of the Board reviews Mr. Rales’ share pledges on a quarterly basis to assess whether such pledging poses an undue risk to the Company. In evaluating Mr. Rales’ pledge of Colfax shares, the Audit Committee considered that Mr. Rales acquired these shares with his own funds in connection with founding the Company and did not receive them as compensation from Colfax; that, as a founder of Colfax and dedicated long-term stockholder, he has (as with many institutional stockholders) pledged a portion of his shares instead of selling shares for liquidity; and that Mr. Rales, as a founder or significant investor in other public companies (including Danaher Corporation and Fortive Corporation), has significant personal assets. In addition to taking into account the number of shares and percentage of outstanding shares pledged, the Audit Committee has also considered the degree of overcollateralization (the amount by which the market value of the shares pledged as collateral exceeds the amount of secured indebtedness), as the Committee believes this is a key factor in assessing the degree of risk posed by the pledging arrangements. Based on its evaluation, the Committee has concluded that the existing pledge arrangements do not pose an undue risk to the Company. The Audit Committee will continue to periodically review the shares pledged as part of its risk oversight function.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

As part of our system of corporate governance, the Board has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”), which was amended and restated in 2016, that is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. The Code of Ethics sets forth Company policies, expectations and procedures on a number of topics, including but not limited to conflicts of interest, compliance with laws, rules and regulations (including insider trading laws), honesty and ethical conduct, and quality. The Code of Ethics also sets forth procedures for reporting violations of the Code and investigations thereof.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  15

Policies on Insider Trading, Hedging and Stock Ownership

The Company has a Policy on Insider Trading and Compliance which, in addition to mandating compliance with insider trading laws, prohibits any director, officer or employee of the Company from engaging in short sales, transactions in derivative securities (including put and call options), or other forms of hedging and monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars, equity swaps, exchange funds and forward sale contracts, that allow the holder to limit or eliminate the risk of a decrease in the value of the Company’s securities. Further, we have stock ownership policies applicable to our directors and executives to promote alignment of interests between our stockholders, directors and management.

Where to Find Our Key Governance Policies

The Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics are available on the Company’s website atwww.colfaxcorp.comon the Investors page under the Corporate Governance tab. These materials also are available in print to any stockholder upon request to: Corporate Secretary, Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701.

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions

We have adopted a written Policy Regarding Related Person Transactions pursuant to which our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or a majority of the disinterested members of our Board generally must approve related person transactions in advance. The policy applies to any transaction or series of similar transactions involving more than $120,000 in which the Company is a participant and in which a “related person” has a direct or indirect material interest. “Related persons” include the Company’s directors, nominees for director, executive officers, and greater than 5% stockholders, as well as the immediate family members of the foregoing. In approving or rejecting the proposed transaction, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the proposed related person transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, the extent of the person’s interest in the transaction and, if applicable, the impact on a director’s independence. Under the policy, if we discover related person transactions that have not been approved, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to be notified and will determine the appropriate action, including ratification, rescission or amendment of the transaction.

Related Person Transactions

Set forth below is a summary of certain transactions since January 1, 2018 in which (i) the Company was or is a participant, (ii) any of our directors, executive officers, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock, or the immediate family members of any of the foregoing had or will have a direct or indirect material interest and (iii) the amount involved exceeds or will exceed $120,000:

Transactions with Danaher Corporation

Certain of our subsidiaries purchase products from and sell products to Danaher Corporation (“Danaher”) from time to time in the ordinary course of business and on an arms’-length basis. Such transactions are pre-approved under our Policy Regarding Related Person Transactions. In 2018, our subsidiaries purchased approximately $118,000 of products from, and sold approximately $49,000 of products to, Danaher, which is less than 0.005% of our, and of Danaher’s, gross revenues for 2018. Our subsidiaries intend to purchase products from and sell products to Danaher in the future in the ordinary course of their businesses and on an arms’-length basis.

Mitchell P. Rales is the Chairman of Danaher’s executive committee and Steven M. Rales is the Chairman of Danaher’s Board of Directors, and both are the beneficial owners of at least 5% of Danaher’s outstanding common stock and our outstanding common stock.

Transactions with Fortive Corporation

Certain of our subsidiaries purchase products from and sell products to Fortive Corporation (“Fortive”) from time to time in the ordinary course of business and on an arms’-length basis. Such transactions are pre-approved under our Policy Regarding Related Person Transactions. In 2018, our subsidiaries purchased approximately $287,000 of products from Fortive, which is less than 0.005% of our, and of Fortive’s, gross revenues for 2018. Our subsidiaries intend to purchase products from and sell products to Fortive in the future in the ordinary course of their businesses and on an arms’-length basis. Mitchell P. Rales and Steven M. Rales are each members of Fortive’s Board of Directors, and both are the beneficial owners of at least 5% of Fortive’s outstanding common stock and our outstanding common stock.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  16

Corporate Social Responsibility

We actively identify and manage environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) considerations that may be material to the long-term sustainability of our business. ESG issues that we focus on across the Company include workplace health and safety, energy efficiency, waste management, climate risk, human capital management, diversity and inclusion, supply chain management, business ethics and compliance, and data privacy and protection.

We take ESG-related risks and opportunities into account in our strategic decision-making, both by the Board and management. ESG matters are managed and monitored by senior management throughout the year. The Board exercises oversight over ESG matters at the full Board level and through our relevant committees.

In 2019 and 2020 we intend to undertake a review of our ESG priorities and programs in connection with a project for the development of a comprehensive business sustainability model. We will be reviewing selected ESG-related policies and procedures, with a focus in part on life-cycle impacts for our products, climate-linked emissions, and resource sustainability. As part of this review and project, we expect to produce and periodically update additional information on our ESG programs, objectives, and accomplishments in future years.

Contacting the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors has established a process for stockholders and interested parties to communicate with the Board and to report complaints or concerns relating to our accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. Stockholders and interested parties wishing to communicate with our Board may do so by writing to any of the members of the Board, the Chairman of the Board, or the non-management members of the Board as a group, at:

Colfax Corporation

420 National Business Parkway, 5thFloor

Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701

Attn: Corporate Secretary

Complaints or concerns relating to our accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to members of the Audit Committee. Other correspondence will be referred to the relevant director or group of directors. Our Policy on Stockholder and Interested Party Communications with the Board of Directors (the “Board Communications Policy”) requires that any stockholder communication to members of the Board prominently display the legend “Board Communication” in order to indicate to the Corporate Secretary that it is communication subject to our policy and will be received and processed by the Corporate Secretary’s office. Each communication received by the Corporate Secretary is copied for our files and promptly forwarded to the addressee. In our Board Communications Policy, the Board has requested that certain items not related to the Board’s duties and responsibilities be excluded from forwarded communications, such as mass mailings and business advertisements. In addition, the Corporate Secretary is not required to forward any communication that the Corporate Secretary, in good faith, determines to be frivolous, unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly unsuitable. However, the Corporate Secretary maintains a list of each communication subject to this policy that is not forwarded, and on a quarterly basis delivers the list to the Chairman of the Board. In addition, each communication subject to this policy that is not forwarded because it was determined by the Secretary to be frivolous, commercial advertising, irrelevant or similarly unsuitable is nevertheless retained in our files and made available at the request of any member of the Board to whom such communication was addressed.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  17
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our Board, at the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, sets the compensation program for non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee reviews this program on an episodic basis and recommends director compensation levels based on its evaluation of competitive levels for director compensation, utilizing data drawn from our current list of peer companies and its reasoned business judgment. See “Role of Compensation Consultants and Peer Data Review” on page 31. The compensation program was last revised in 2017.

Our non-employee Board members receive the following:

an annual cash retainer of $80,000;
an annual equity award valued at $125,000, calculated under the same valuation approach applied in determining our annual equity grants as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Additional Compensation Information—Equity Grant Practice,” and awarded in connection with our annual meeting of stockholders, which consists of 50% director restricted stock units that vest after one year of service on the Board and 50% director stock options, which are fully vested upon grant and exercisable for a seven-year term;
a $20,000 annual retainer for service as the Chair of our Audit Committee and a $15,000 annual retainer for service as Chair of the Compensation Committee or of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and
an initial equity grant of 5,556 restricted stock units upon joining the Board, which vest in three equal annual installments and are settled upon termination of service on the Board.

Our non-executive Chairman of the Board is entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $1 and does not receive any other cash fees or the initial or annual equity awards described above.

The Board has also approved a stock ownership policy for our directors. Each director is required to own shares our common stock (including shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and shares underlying restricted stock units) with a value equal to five times the annual cash retainer within five years of joining the Board. All of our directors except for Ms. Wienbar and Mr. Teirlinck, who were appointed during 2016 and 2017, respectively, have achieved these ownership targets as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Further, our Board has adopted a policy prohibiting any director (or executive officer) from pledging as security under any obligation any shares of Colfax common stock that he or she directly or indirectly owns and controls (other than shares already pledged as of February 17, 2014), and providing that pledged shares of Colfax common stock do not count toward our stock ownership requirements.

The Board has adopted a Director Deferred Compensation Plan which permits non-employee directors to receive, at their discretion, deferred stock units, or DSUs, in lieu of their annual cash retainers and committee chairperson retainers. A director who elects to receive DSUs receives a number of units determined by dividing the cash fees earned during, and deferred for, the quarter by the closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant, which is the last trading day of the quarter. A non-employee director also may convert director restricted stock unit grants to DSUs under the plan. DSUs granted to our directors convert to shares of our common stock after termination of service from the Board, based upon a schedule elected by the director in advance. In the event that there is not a director elects to receive DSUs, the director will receive dividend equivalent rights on such DSUs to the extent dividends are issued on our common stock. Dividend equivalents are deemed reinvested in additional DSUs (or fractions thereof)sufficient number of votes at the dividend payment date.

We also reimburse all directorsSpecial Meeting to approve Proposal 1. In order to permit proxies that have been timely received to be voted for travelsuch adjournments, we are submitting this proposal as a separate matter for your consideration. If it is necessary to adjourn the Special Meeting and other necessary business expenses incurred inif the performanceadjournment is for a period of their services on our Board30 days or less and the committees thereof and extend coverage to them under our directors’ and officers’ indemnity insurance policies.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  18

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid to our directors during 2018:

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 2018

Name Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
(2)  Option
Awards
($)
(4)  Total
($)
 
Mitchell P. Rales  1           1 
Patrick W. Allender  95,000(1)   62,501(3)   62,511   220,011 
Thomas S. Gayner  80,000(1)   62,501(3)   62,511   205,011 
Rhonda L. Jordan  95,000(1)   62,501(3)   62,511   220,011 
San W. Orr, III
(served until 2018
Annual Meeting)
  20,000           20,000 
A. Clayton Perfall  100,000(1)   62,501(3)   62,511   225,011 
Didier Teirlinck  80,000(1)   62,501(3)      205,011 
Rajiv Vinnakota  80,000    62,501    62,511   205,011 
Sharon Wienbar  80,000(1)   62,501(3)   62,511   205,011 
(1)Messrs. Allender, Gayner, Perfall, Teirlinck and Mses. Jordan and Wienbar elected to receive DSUs in lieu of their annual cash retainers and committee chairperson retainers. DSUs convert to shares of our common stock after termination of service from the Board, based upon a schedule elected by the director in advance. During 2019, the amount of DSUs received in lieu of annual cash retainers and committee chairperson retainers by these directors was as follows: Mr. Allender— 3,316, Mr. Gayner— 2,812, Ms. Jordan— 3,316, Mr. Perfall— 3,491, Mr. Teirlinck— 2,812, and Ms. Wienbar— 2,812. DSUs received for these cash retainers are considered “vested” and thus are not reflected in the table below.
(2)Amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” column represent the grant date fair value for stock awards to each director during 2018, as computed pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). See note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2019. The amounts reflect the grant date fair value of the 2019 annual grant of 1,974 restricted stock units made to each director in connection with the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, which vest in full on May 17, 2019.
(3)1,974 restricted stock units granted to each of these directors, which were awarded in connection with the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, were converted into DSUs at the election of each director. DSUs convert to shares of our common stock after termination of service on the Board, based upon a schedule selected by each director in advance. These DSUs will vest in full on May 17, 2019 in accordance with the vesting schedule applicable to the underlying restricted stock units.
(4)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value for options to purchase 5,302 shares of our common stock granted to each director in connection with the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, as computed pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718. See note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2019.The director stock options are fully vested upon grant and exercisable for a seven-year term.

As of December 31, 2018, the aggregate number of unvested stock awards and unexercised options outstanding held by our non-employee directors was as follows:

Name Restricted
Stock Units
  Stock
Options
 
Mitchell P. Rales      
Patrick W. Allender  1,974   24,423 
Thomas S. Gayner  1,974   24,423 
Rhonda L. Jordan  1,974   24,423 
A. Clayton Perfall  1,974   24,423 
Didier Teirlinck  5,678   5,302 
Rajiv Vinnakota  1,974   24,423 
Sharon Wienbar  3,826   9,540 

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  19
Proposal 2Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We are asking our stockholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of our independent auditors. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent auditor since their appointment in 2002. Although stockholder ratification is not required, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is being submitted for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice with a view towards soliciting stockholders’ opinions which the Audit Committee will take into consideration in future deliberations. If the selection is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interestsrecord date remains unchanged, no notice of the Companytime and our stockholders. The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee believe that the retention of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditor is in the best interestsplace of the Companyreconvened meeting will be given to stockholders, other than an announcement of the place and its stockholders.

Representatives for Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be presenttime of the adjourned meeting made at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.Special Meeting.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and ServicesVote Required

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Fee Category (fees in thousands) 2018  2017 
Audit Fees 5,827  5,790 
Audit-Related Fees     1,054 
Tax Fees  1,146   1,115 
All Other Fees  2   2 
TOTAL 6,975  8,001 

Audit Fees

This category of the table above includes fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 that were for professional services rendered (including reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses) for the integrated audits of our annual consolidated financial statements, for reviews of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and for statutory audits.

Audit-Related Fees

This category of the table above includes the fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” For 2017, Audit-Related Fees included the audited carve-out financial statements of our Fluid Handling business in connection with the disposition of that business in December 2017. There were no Audit-Related Fees incurred for 2018.

Tax Fees

This category of the table above includes fees billed for tax compliance, tax preparation, tax planning and other tax services. For 2018, Tax Fees included approximately $910,555 for tax compliance and tax preparation and approximately $234,920 for tax planning and other tax services. For 2017, Tax Fees included approximately $885,000 for tax compliance and tax preparation and approximately $270,000 for tax planning and other tax services.

All Other Fees

This category of the table above includes fees billed for products and services other than those described above under Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees. For 2018 and 2017, these included fees incurred for Ernst & Young LLP’s online accounting information tool.

The Audit Committee has considered whether the services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the fees described above are compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence and has concluded that such services do not impair its independence.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  20

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all auditing services, review and attest services, internal control related services and non-audit services provided to the Company by the independent registered public accounting firm and all fees payable by the Company to the independent registered public accounting firm for such services. The Audit Committee also is responsible for overseeing the audit fee negotiations associated with the retention of Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of our financial statements. The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy to promote compliance with the NYSE’s listing standards and the applicable SEC rules and regulations relating to auditor independence. In accordance with the Audit Committee charter and the pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee reviews with Ernst & Young LLP and management the plan and scope of Ernst & Young LLP’s proposed annual financial audit and quarterly reviews, including the procedures to be utilized and Ernst & Young LLP’s compensation, and pre-approves all auditing services, review and attest services, internal control related services and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for us by Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more members of the Audit Committee consistent with the pre-approval policy, provided that the decisions of such Audit Committee member or members must be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Pre-approval of permitted non-audit services can only be approved by the full Audit Committee.

VOTE REQUIRED

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the AnnualSpecial Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter is required for the approval of the adjournment of the Special Meeting, if necessary. Abstentions with respect to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLPAdjournment Proposal will have the same effect as a vote against the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.Adjournment Proposal.

BOARD RECOMMENDATIONBoard Recommendation

 

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote“FOR”FORthe ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019. Proposal 2.

 

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  
  21
LOGO  

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

12


Back to Contents
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK

The Audit Committee consists of A. Clayton Perfall, Patrick Allender, Thomas Gayner, and Didier Teirlinck, who are all non-management directors. The members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and financial literacy requirements of the NYSE and the additional, heightened independence criteria applicable to members of the Audit Committee under SEC and NYSE rules. In 2018, the Audit Committee held nine meetings. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, which it annually reviews. The charter, which complies with all current regulatory requirements, is available on the Company’s website atwww.colfaxcorp.comon the Investors page under the Corporate Governance tab. During 2018, at each of its regularly scheduled meetings, the Audit Committee met with senior members of the Company’s finance team. Additionally, the Audit Committee has separate private sessions, during its regularly scheduled meetings, with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and head of internal audit, respectively. The Audit Committee is updated periodically on management’s process to assess the adequacy of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting, the framework used to make the assessment, and management’s conclusions on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm, their evaluation of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee evaluates the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm each year and determines whether to reengage the current independent registered accounting firm or consider other independent registered accounting firms. In doing so, the Audit Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the independent registered accounting firm, the firm’s global capabilities, and the firm’s technical expertise, tenure as the Company’s independent registered accounting firm and knowledge of the Company’s global operations and businesses. In connection with the applicable audit partner rotation requirements, the Audit Committee also is involved in considering the selection of the auditors’ lead engagement partner when rotation is required. Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee decided to engage Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Audit Committee reviews with the independent registered accounting firm and management, the overall audit scope and plans, as well as the results of internal and external audit examinations and evaluations by management and the independent registered accounting firm of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and the quality of the Company’s financial reporting. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommends that the Board ask stockholders, at the Company’s annual meeting, to ratify the appointment of the independent registered accounting firm (see Proposal 2 beginning on page 20).

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 with management and with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, including a discussion of the quality and suitability of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant accounting judgments and estimates, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. In addressing the quality of management’s accounting judgments, members of the Audit Committee are appraised of certifications prepared by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer that the unaudited quarterly and audited annual consolidated financial statements of the Company fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

In performing all of these functions, the Audit Committee acts in an oversight capacity. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s quarterly and annual reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K prior to filing with the SEC. In its oversight role, the Audit Committee relies on the work and assurances of the Company’s management, which has the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for preparing the financial statements, and other reports, and of the independent registered public accounting firm, who are engaged to review the quarterly consolidated financial statements of the Company, and audit and report on the annual consolidated financial statements of the Company and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the Company’s year-end.

The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence. On the basis of the reviews and discussions referenced above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

A. Clayton Perfall, Audit Committee Chair
Patrick Allender
Thomas Gayner
Didier Teirlinck

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  22
Back to Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of our named executive officers for 2018 should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth under the section heading “Executive Compensation.”

Executive Summary

Named Executive Officers

The following discussion provides details regarding our executive compensation program and the compensation of our named executive officers in 2018. Our named executive officers (“NEOs”) for 2018 are:

NameTitle
Matthew TrerotolaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Christopher HixSVP, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Daniel PryorEVP, Strategy and Business Development
Shyam KambeyandaSVP, Colfax, ESAB President
Ian BranderSVP, Colfax, Howden President

Our Compensation Philosophy and Guiding Principles

Our executive compensation approach links compensation to Company and individual performance while aligning the long-term interests of management and stockholders. We strive to create a compensation program for our associates, including our executives, that provides a compelling and engaging opportunity to attract, retain and motivate the best talent. We believe that our compensation programs motivate performance-driven leadership that is aligned to achieve our financial and strategic objectives with the intention to deliver superior long-term returns to our stockholders. Utilizing this philosophy, our executive compensation program has been designed to:

Link rewards to performance and foster a team-based approachEach executive has clear performance expectations and must contribute to our overall success rather than solely to objectives within his or her primary area of responsibility.
Align the performance responsibilities of executives with the long-term interests of stockholdersOur program emphasizes long-term stockholder value creation by using stock options and performance-based restricted stock units, in combination with a stock ownership policy, to deliver long-term compensation incentives while minimizing risk taking behaviors that could negatively affect long-term results.
Provide transparency through simplicity of design and practicesWe provide three main elements in our compensation program– base salary, annual incentive cash bonuses, and long-term incentives–with an appropriate blend of purposes and incentives linked to easily understood objectives, as described further on page 26.

Fiscal 2018 Pay for Performance Alignment and Compensation Overview

During the year we delivered strong financial performance and furthered our portfolio transformation that we believe will build sustained long-term value for our stockholders. Corporate earnings increased 33% and exceeded our expectations, supported in part by strong growth in our ESAB business and improved operating execution in our Howden business. We acquired four complementary businesses in growing markets and in the fourth quarter announced the acquisition of DJO Global, Inc. (“DJO”), a leading global orthopedic solutions business. Following the 2017 divestiture of our Fluid Handling business, the DJO acquisition continues our drive to create a higher margin and less cyclical company with increased exposure to growing markets.

We achieved and exceeded our internal corporate financial and operational goals, leading to an overall corporate bonus achievement under our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) of 121% for Messrs. Trerotola, Hix, and Pryor.

ESAB drove significant growth year-over-year for the second consecutive year and improved its adjusted operating profit and working capital turns. These results were reflected in an AIP achievement of 120% for Mr. Kambeyanda.

Howden made continued progress in reshaping the business for less cyclical, more profitable growth and furthered the shift to faster-growing industrial applications. Orders and backlog

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  23
Back to Contents

increased during the year and we achieved significant year-over-year margin improvement during the fourth quarter. End-market pressures impacted the operating environment for the full year, as reflected in an AIP achievement of 95% for Mr. Brander.

Further, the Compensation Committee took the following actions with respect to long-term incentives during 2018:

Mr. Trerotola did not receive any equity awards in 2018 due to his new hire grant in 2015 and his special equity grant that was made in January 2016;
Annual equity awards for our other NEOs consisted of approximately equal parts of (i) stock options that vest in equal installments over a three-year period following their grant date, and (ii) performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) that clfif vest in three years, if earned, based on the achievement of operating margin and total stockholder return (“TSR”) targets over a three-year measurement period, except that Mr. Brander received a portion of his grant as restricted stock units (“RSUs”) as discussed below; and
Mr. Pryor’s responsibilities were expanded to include the areas of IT and cybersecurity and, in recognition of this change and consistent with the competitive market for his expanded role, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time promotional increase to Mr. Pryor’s 2018 long-term incentive award.

2018 Say-On-Pay Vote

At our 2018 Annual Meeting, approximately 98% of the stockholder votes cast on our advisory proposal to approve the compensation of our NEOs were voted in favor of our executive compensation proposal. Our Compensation Committee considered the outcome of this vote in the context of our prior and on-going engagement with stockholders and accordingly did not make any additional changes to our executive compensation policies and program elements. The Compensation Committee has determined to provide for an annual “say-on-pay” proposal and will continue to carefully evaluate the feedback received from our stockholders in connection with the voting on that proposal.

Our Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program includes elements designed to align with Company objectives and long-term stockholder returns, including PRSU grants redesigned in 2017 with a cumulative three-year performance period for both a key operational improvement metric (for 2018, adjusted operating margin) and TSR relative to a comparable benchmark index (S&P MidCap 400 Industrials), as well as an annual say-on-pay vote for consistent stockholder feedback.

For 2018 the Compensation Committee established the following target compensation program for our executive officers:

2018 NEO Incentive Compensation Structure (Average)

75% of NEO compensation “at risk” and aligned with company and shareholder success

*This reflects performance goals under the plan for corporate-level executives; weightings and performance goals differ for business unit executives as discussed below.

Our 2018 executive compensation structure consists of three core compensation elements– base salary, an annual cash bonus, and long-term incentives. The Compensation Committee reviewed each element individually while also considering the total compensation

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  24
Back to Contents

package provided to create an appropriate mix designed to attract, incentivize, and retain our executives. The following table summarizes the core elementssets forth certain information as of our 2018 executive compensation program:

Element of CompensationPurpose/DescriptionForm/Timing of Payout
Base SalaryEstablished at a competitive level to attract and retain our executive talent. Provides a base level of compensation that is not at risk to avoid fluctuations in compensation that could distract executives from the performance of their responsibilitiesPaid in cash throughout the year
Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”)Variable compensation that rewards our executive officers for achievement of critical annual operational and financial performance goals by the Company and, if applicable, respective business units, and recognizes the executive’s individual performance during the year.Paid in cash after the year has ended and performance has been measured.

See page 26 for further detail.
Long-Term Incentive PlanVariable compensation that aligns the rewards of executives with the interests of stockholders to encourage actions and long-term prioritization that we believe will increase stockholder value by generating sustained and superior operational and financial performance over an extended period of time.See page 29 for further detail.

The framework of our executive compensation program includes the governance features and other specific elements discussed below:

What we doWhat we don’t do
Pay for performance focus – Our AIP compensation is linked to pre-established financial and operational goals that are intended to drive performance over the annual performance plan period. Options and PRSUs are linked with longer-term performance, our stock price, and, for PRSUs, a key operational metric and relative TSR, which we believe incentivizes long-term Company success and stockholder value creation.No gross-up payments to cover excise taxes or perquisites – We do not provide tax gross-ups to our executives in connection with severance benefits or executive perquisites other than relocation.
Varying performance metrics under short-term and longer-term incentive plans – In balancing compensation objectives linked to short-term and long-term periods of time, the Company seeks to align compensation with several performance metrics that are critical to achievement of sustained growth and stockholder value creation.No pledging or hedging of Company stock – We prohibit our executives and directors from hedging Colfax stock and from entering into new pledge arrangements or derivative agreements using Colfax stock.
Caps on Annual Incentive Plan payouts – Executive bonus payments are capped under our AIP, as approved by our stockholders, in part to discourage excessive risk taking. The Compensation Committee is prohibited from increasing the results with respect to each performance metric once established, but retains the discretion to reduce or eliminate compensation under our AIP even if performance goals are attained.No repricing or buyout of underwater stock options –We do not permit the repricing of underwater stock options without the express approval of our stockholders.
Double trigger provisions for change in control – Severance payable upon a change in control is only received upon executive’s employment termination without cause or resignation for good reason within two years following the change in control. This approach is commonly referred to as “double trigger.”No excessive change in control payments – No severance upon a change in control in excess of two times salary and target bonus.
Clawback Policy and Insider Trading Policy – We have a comprehensive compensation clawback policy that is triggered by a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements and applies to all of our executive officers, and enforce a strict insider trading policy and blackout periods for executives and directors.No short-term vesting – We do not award any long-term incentives with a vesting period shorter than one-year.
Stock Ownership Policy – We have a robust stock ownership policy to further align the long-term financial interests of Company executives with those of our stockholders.No compensation programs or policies that reward for material or excessive risk taking – We annually review the Company’s compensation policies and practices in relation to our risk management practice and any potential risk-taking incentives. Our most recent assessment in March 2019 concluded that the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Independent Compensation Committee and Consultant –Our Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors. The compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee during 2018, FW Cook (i) is, based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment, independent and without any conflicts of interest with the Company and (ii) has never provided any services to the Company other than the compensation-related services provided to the Compensation Committee. See page 32 for further details.No pension plan – We do not maintain a pension plan for any senior executives, other than a frozen foreign plan that we acquired via acquisition which is limited to a small number of historical participants.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  25
Back to Contents

Determination of Executive Compensation and Performance Criteria

Our executive compensation program is based on the philosophy and design outlined above with a focus on exceptional performance and continuous improvement from our management team. Within this framework, the Compensation Committee exercises its reasoned business judgment in making executive compensation decisions and takes into account recommendations by our Chief Executive OfficerDecember 31, 2021 (unless otherwise specified), with respect to the compensation of each executive officer, other than himself (see “CEO Recommendations” on page 31). Some of the factors that generally are referenced when making executive compensation decisions, none of which are assigned a particular weight, are as follows:

The nature of the executive’s position
The Compensation Committee’s assessment of pay levels and practices for executives with the skills and experince our executives possess (see “Role of Compensation Consultants and Peer Data Review” on page 31)
The performance record of the executive
The Company’s operational and financial performance
The executive’s leadership potential
The retention value of our compensation program over time

Further, a substantial percentage of compensation under our Annual Incentive Plan is determined solely by the achievement of annual performance criteria based on Board-approved financial and operational goals for the fiscal year. These goals are then incorporated into the metrics set for our Annual Incentive Plan and approved by the Compensation Committee, as further discussed under “Bonus Calculation - Financial and Operational Metrics and 2018 Performance Results” on page 28. We believe that this link to our Board-established corporate and business goals reinforces alignment and incentives for breakthrough results both at the business-unit level and Company-wide.

Elements of Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program

Base Salary

Base salaries are designed to provide compensation that is market competitive so that we can attract the best qualified individuals and retain our senior management. Base salaries are established at an executive’s hire and generally reviewed annually for potential increases. The salary levels set for our NEOs in fiscal 2018 were based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the relative roles and responsibilities of management and the results of their individual performance assessments, combined with perspective from the competitive compensation data prepared by FW Cook and the Compensation Committee’s reasoned business judgment. NEO base salaries were modestly increased in 2018 primarily reflecting our continued operational improvements and the Compensation Committee’s competitive marketplace review. A comparison of base salary levels set for 2018 and 2017 is set forth below:

Named Executive Officer 2017 Annual
Base Salary
  2018 Annual
Base Salary
  Percentage
Increase
Mr. Trerotola $1,030,000  $1,056,000         2.5%
Mr. Hix $560,000  $575,000   2.7%
Mr. Pryor $530,000  $550,000   3.8%
Mr. Kambeyanda $490,000  $510,000   4.1%
Mr. Brander £310,000  £320,000   3.2%

Annual Incentive Plan

The goal of our AIP is to reward our executives for achievement in key areas of Company operational and financial performance as well as each executive’s individual contributions to Company success. Our AIP provides our NEOs the opportunity to receive an incentive payment that is expressed as a percentage of the executive’s base salary (i.e., “target bonus”). Our AIP performance measures and specific financial and operational metrics are established at the beginning of each year and are derived from annual goals for Colfax’s operational and financial performance established by our Board in its strategic planning and corporate budget development.

The performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee for business leaders reflect both Company-wide and business-specific performance targets. In addition, the amount payable under the AIP can be adjusted upward or downward based on the individual performance factor, which is linked to specific, individualized goals. Actual bonus amounts are determined following completion of the performance year and are based on performance relative to the pre-established goals using the following formulas:

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  26
Back to Contents

 

Under our Annual Incentive Plan:

executives can achieve a payout percentage of their target bonus ranging from zero for below-target performance to a threshold of 50% to a maximum of 200%, with 100% target goal achievement resulting in 100% payout of the individual’s target bonus for that performance metric, based on the extent to which objective pre-established financial and operational performance goals are achieved; and
the amount earned based on Company-wide and business-specific performance is subject to adjustment upward (by up to 50%, subject to a 250% payout cap) or downward to zero based on individual achievement as measured by an Individual Performance Factor (IPF).

The IPF is linked to each executive’s specific annual objectives, which are separate from the operational performance measures under the Annual Incentive Plan but are also designed to meaningfully drive Company performance, key initiatives, and build our foundation for future growth.

Detail regarding the individual components of these formulas, including a calculation of the payout percentages and description of the IPF component, follows the NEO bonus payout tables.

Key Executive Team Achievements

Delivery of earnings, revenue growth, and initiatives that reduced our income tax rate, consistent with our commitment to providing long-term stockholder returns
Continued increases in ESAB sales while successfully navigating raw material cost inflation
Howden order improvement and momentum on end-market diversification
Increased new product and applications development and improved vitality index for sales of these new offerings
Execution of restructuring actions that reduced our 2018 costs
Announced acquisition of DJO and strategic review of Howden business, furthering porfolio transformation, completed the initial portion of the financing for the DJO acquisition, which was achieved on attractive terms, and acquired four complementary businesses in focused growth markets
Sale of Circor shares from the Fluid Handling divestment, completing the monetization of this business at an attractive multiple

Bonuses Paid for 2018 Performance

Bonuses were calculated using the following formula before application of the IPF as described below on page 29. The target and actual bonus award paid to each NEO under the AIP for 2018 are set forth below. These bonuses are also reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table below on page 35.

NEO Base Salary Target Bonus
Percentage
 Target
Bonus
 Payout Percentage Total Annual Incentive
including IPF
 
Mr. Trerotola $1,056,000 X125% = $1,320,000 X121% =$1,676,000 
Mr. Hix $575,000 X80% = $460,000 X121%  =$640,000 
Mr. Pryor $550,000 X80% = $440,000 X121%  =$532,000 
Mr. Kambeyanda $510,000 X75% = $382,500 X120%  =$460,000 
Mr. Brander £320,000 X75% = £240,000 X95%  =£273,000 

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  27
Back to Contents

Bonus Calculation – Target Bonus

The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves AIP target bonus percentages for each executive officer in alignment with our compensation philosophy and taking into consideration the Compensation Committee’s competitive marketplace review. Targets as a percentage of base salary did not change from prior year targets except for Mr. Trerotola, whose AIP target increased from 120% to 125% to better align with the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the competitive market.

Bonus Calculation – Financial and Operational Metrics and 2018 Performance Results

For corporate executives, financial targets based on net sales (as adjusted), operating profit (as adjusted), working capital turns (as adjusted), and adjusted EPS constituted the performance measures under our AIP before the IPF was applied (as discussed further below on page 29). For all NEOs, the “target goals” (the level of performance necessary to achieve the target bonus payout) were pre-established by the Compensation Committee based upon Board-approved operational and financial goals for 2018 that represented a significant level of improvement over 2017 results, after taking into account the disposition of our fluid handling business, and were set at levels that would represent significant progress in each category toward the achievement of the Company’s long-term growth objectives and align with the Board-approved corporate budget.

For Messrs. Kambeyanda and Brander, corporate measures constituted 30% of the potential payout factor with their business unit goals consisting of 70% of the total target, which is intended to drive accountability for business operational results. The Compensation Committee selected these weightings when it established the goals for the year based on the results of our Board’s strategic planning process and corporate budget. Prior to application of the IPF, the AIP is formulaic in nature and neither the Board, the Compensation Committee nor any executive is able to exercise any upward discretion with respect to the payout levels for each performance metric once established by the Compensation Committee. The financial and operational performance measures and corresponding weightings of these metrics for 2018 were as follows:

Measure Corporate ESAB Howden
Net sales (as adjusted)(1); Orders for Howden 25% 30% 30%
Operating Profit (as adjusted)(2) 40% 50% 50%
Working Capital Turns (as adjusted)(3) 20% 20% 20%
Adjusted EPS(4) 15% N/A N/A

(1)Net sales measured by U.S. GAAP sales excluding any sales from unbudgeted 2018 acquisitions, compared to 2018 budgeted sales at actual FX rates.
(2)Adjusted operating profit measured by U.S. GAAP operating income excluding operating income from unbudgeted 2018 acquisitions and adjusting forrestructuring, non-cash asset impairments including goodwill and intangibles, transaction costs for acquisitions in excess of budget, FX gains or losses arisingfrom the initial recognition of a highly inflationary currency, financial asset impacts (due to unusual economic circumstances or devaluation by a governingbody), early extinguishment of debt costs, the cumulative effect of accounting changes, or other unplanned or nonrecurring items that the CompensationCommittee considers unusual and not representative of the underlying economic performance of the Company.
(3)Working capital turns measured by the weighted average of the quarterly turns for the fiscal year, computed by dividing annualized quarterly sales by the average endingworking capital for each quarter. Working capital is defined as the sum of accounts receivable, other receivables, promissory notes, inventory, accounts payable, andnonrecurring items that the Compensation Committee considers unusual and not representative of the underlying economic performance of the Company.
(4)Adjusted EPS is defined as net income adjusted for the after-tax impact of discontinued operations, the cumulative effect of accounting changes, restructuringcosts, non-cash asset impairments including goodwill and intangibles, costs related to acquisitions in excess of budgeted amounts, financial asset impacts (due tounusual economic circumstances or devaluation by a governing body), as further adjusted for the impact of foreign currency exchange gains or losses arising fromthe initial recognition of a highly inflationary currency, early extinguishment of debt costs, or other unplanned or nonrecurring items that the Compensation Committeeconsiders unusual and not representative of the underlying economic performance of the Company, dividied by the weighted average of diluted shares outstanding.

Payouts under our AIP are calculated using the following scale, before application of the IPF (which impact is capped by the 250% maximum payout):

2018 Annual Incentive Plan Payout to Performance

Metric Performance % of plan

*Working capital turns (WCT) threshold and maximum set within bounds based on management assessment of WCT performance expectations.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  28
Back to Contents

The 2018 corporate performance goals and achievement for each are set forth below. These goals took into account the impact of the fluid handing business disposition in late 2017, which business performance and contributions were included in the goals set and measurement of achievement for 2017. Accordingly, 2018 goals were below levels set for 2017 other than for adjusted earnings per share given the timing during our platform transformation. As shown in the table, the weighted average performance result for 2018 corporate metrics was 121% of plan, compared to 83% of plan for 2017 and 79% of plan for 2016.

Measure
(weighting)
 Target Goal  Threshold
Goal
  Threshold
Payment
 Maximum
Goal
  Maximum
Payment
 Actual
Result
  Payout
Percentage
 Net Payout
Percentage
based on
weighting
Net sales
(as adjusted) (25%)
 $3.491 billion  $3.143 billion  50% $3.840 billion  200% $3.579 billion  25% 31%
Operating Profit
(as adjusted) (40%)
 $333 million  $267 million  50% $400 million  200% $321 million  40% 36%
Working Capital Turns
(as adjusted) (20%)
  4.4   4.2  50%  4.6  200%  4.5  20% 30%
Adjusted EPS (15%) $2.07/share  $1.66/share  50% $2.49/share  200% $2.31/share  15% 24%
Weighted aggregate for all corporate metrics in 2018          121%

The table below summarizes the 2018 achievement of business goals for Messrs. Kambeyanda and Brander, which aggregated with the corporate goal results as shown above determine their AIP financial and operational performance factor:

Measure ESAB* Howden*
Sales (as adjusted); Orders for Howden (30%) 148% 93%
Operating Profit (as adjusted) (50%) 97% 89%
Working Capital Turns (as adjusted) (20%) 160% 55%
Business Achievement 120% 83%

*The respective business unit metrics constituted 70% of each executive’s potential AIP performance payout, in aggregate, and the corporate metrics constituted 30% of the potential payout.

We do not disclose the specific target goals or achievement applicable to our business segments as they are highly confidential to our businesses. We believe that disclosure of this information would be competitively harmful to us, as it would provide our competitors with strategic information specific to certain businesses, thus providing our competitors insight into our plans and projections for such businesses. As evidenced by our performance this year, these target levels are designed to be difficult to accomplish and are not certain to be met.

Bonus Calculation– Individual Performance Factor

In addition to the target bonus percentages and financial and operational metrics discussed above, the third and final factor under our AIP is the Individual Performance Factor (IPF). This is a multiplier that ranges from 0 to 1.5 (subject to an overall payout cap of 250% of the target bonus) based on individual performance, embodiment of our Company’s core values, and achievement of key performance indicators (KPIs) set in advance for each executive by our CEO, or, for our CEO, by the Board. The individual performance factor and KPIs set thereunder are included as part of the AIP so that non-financial Company objectives over which the executive has primary control are factored in as a reasonable part of the individual’s total annual bonus for the year. The individual performance factors for each executive were determined after evaluating each NEO’s performance, including the collective achievements detailed on page 27 above. For AIP payouts, bonus allocations were formulated based on Board-approved budgets, with a 1.0x average payout target for participants in the AIP and deviations from that average permitted if supported by performance or based on external circumstances outside of management’s control. For 2018, IPFs for our NEOs ranged from 1.0 to 1.2.

Long-Term Incentives

The goal of our long-term incentive plan is to align the compensation of executives with the interests of stockholders by encouraging sustained long-term improvement in operational and financial performance and long-term increase in stockholder value. Long-term incentives also serve as retention instruments and provide equity-building opportunities for executives. In recent years, we have granted stock options and PRSUs as our primary forms of equity awards, with service-based RSUs being granted principally as recruitment or promotion awards at the time of hire or promotion. PRSUs granted in 2017 and 2018 are subject to achieving a key operational improvement metric (adjusted operating margin) over a three-year period and an investor return benchmark (relative TSR vs. the S&P MidCap 400 Industrials Index), also measured over a three-year period. Once vested, at least 50% of the shares delivered pursuant to the PRSUs (net of shares withheld or sold for taxes) must be held for an additional one-year period.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  29
Back to Contents

2018 Performance Vesting of Outstanding PRSUs

The performance metrics for PRSUs granted in July 2015, November 2015 and in 2016, as adjusted to reflect the divestiture of the Colfax Fluid Handling business, were certified as achieved during 2018 and vest in installments based on continued service in 2018, 2019, and 2020. These awards granted in July 2015 and November 2015 began to vest in 2018, as reflected in “Options Exercised and Stock Vested” table below on page 41.

Annual Grants under Omnibus Incentive Plan

On March 8, 2018, the Compensation Committee granted stock options and PRSUs under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan with a target aggregate value as set forth in the table below. Mr. Trerotola did not receive annual equity grants in 2018 due to his new hire grant in 2015 and his special equity grant that was made in January 2016. Each NEO except for Mr. Brander received 50% of the annual award in the form of PRSUs and 50% of the annual award in the form of stock options. As discussed further above on page 24, Mr. Pryor’s grant reflected a one-time promotional increase due to his increased responsibilities in the areas of IT and cybersecurity and the Compensation Committee’s review of relevant market data for his expanded role. Mr. Brander’s award included stock options with a target grant date value of approximately $350,000, PRSUs with a target grant date value of approximately $350,000 consistent with the PRSU award terms for those made to our other NEOs, and RSUs with a target grant date value of approximately $300,000 that vest one year following the grant date. These RSUs were granted in contemplation of a strategic review for the Air & Gas Handling Business, which led in part to the process for exploration of the potential sale of Howden announced in connection with the DJO acquisition.

Annual Grant RecipientTotal Aggregate
Value of Grant
($)
Mr. Trerotola
Mr. Hix2,000,000
Mr. Pryor3,750,000
Mr. Kambeyanda1,200,000
Mr. Brander1,000,000

Stock options vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and PRSUs cliff vest at the end of the three-year measurement period to the extent of achievement of the performance metrics based on the following payout scale, with each factor weighted 50% in determining the award payout:

  3 Year TSR Percentile Rank* Adjusted
Operating
Margin*
 Resulting
Shares Earned
(% of target)
Below Threshold <30th <11.5% 0%
Threshold 30th 11.5% 50%
Target 55th 12% 100%
Maximum 80th 12.5% 200%

*Linear interpolation between achievement points

Additional Compensation Information

Other Elements of Compensation–Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation and Perquisites

The Company does not maintain an active pension plan and instead makes matching contributions to a tax-qualified 401(k) plan and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. We established the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which provides participants the opportunity to defer a percentage of their compensation without regard to the compensation limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code under our 401(k) plan, to allow our senior-level executives to contribute toward retirement on a tax-effective basis in a manner that is consistent with other Colfax employees who are not limited by the Internal Revenue Code limits. For additional details concerning the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, please see the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table and the accompanying narrative disclosure. With respect to Mr. Brander, who is based in the U.K., as discussed below in the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table, Howden makes contributions to the Howden Retirement Plan, a defined contribution plan, on his behalf. In addition, as discussed following the Pension Benefits table below, Mr. Brander maintains a balance in the Howden Group Retention Plan, a frozen defined benefit pension plan. Mr. Brander’s benefits under the Howden Group Retention Plan do not grow with any additional earnings or service.

Aside from the benefits provided to Mr. Trerotola at the time of his hire, which include (i) an automobile allowance of $20,000 per year and (ii) personal use of a private aircraft chartered by the Company and/or personal financial planning services (or any combination thereof) in an aggregate amount not to exceed $100,000 in compensation income (i.e., imputed income under tax rules) in any calendar year, we provide minimal perquisites to our executives including up to $10,000 in financial and tax planning services for senior executives, business-related items such as relocation assistance, which may be grossed-up consistent with competitive market recruitment practices, and benefits provided in non-U.S. locations in accordance with local practice.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  30
Back to Contents

Employment & Service Agreements

Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor are party to the same form of employment agreement. These agreements provide for a two-year initial term, or in the case of Mr. Trerotola’s CEO Employment Agreement, a three-year initial term, with automatic one-year term extensions thereafter, unless our Board or the executive provides written notice in advance to terminate the automatic extension provision. Each executive’s base salary may not be reduced below the amount previously in effect without the written agreement of the executive. In addition, as set forth in their current employment agreements, each of Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor are entitled to participate in our Annual Incentive Plan with a target bonus amount no less than 120% and 50%, respectively, of his base salary then in effect. The employment agreements provide severance benefits and provide change in control benefits only if a termination for “good reason” or other than for “cause” occurs within two years following the change in control (i.e., “double trigger” provisions”).

Mr. Hix’s letter agreement entered into upon his hire provides for severance and change in control benefits primarily commensurate with those provided in our employment agreements. Mr. Kambeyanda is party to a letter agreement with the Company that specifies his starting annual salary and a target bonus of at least 70% under the AIP. This agreement also provides for a transition bonus made in connection with his hire that is to be paid in installments over his first five years of employment (with $330,000 payable in 2017, and $130,000 payable in each of 2018, 2019 and 2020). This letter agreement also provides that Mr. Kambeyanda is subject to our Executive Officer Severance Plan. Mr. Brander is party to a service agreement with Howden Group Ltd., which he entered into prior to our acquisition of the Howden business in 2012.

Additional details regarding the material terms of these agreements are summarized under “Employment Agreements and Executive Officer Severance Plan” on page 40 and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 42 and a summary of the materials terms and eligibility requirements for the Executive Officer Severance Plan is provided under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”.

Stock Ownership Policy and Stock Holding Requirements

Our stockbeneficial ownership policy further aligns the long-term financial interests of Company executives with those of our stockholders while also serving as a risk mitigation tool. Each executive at a vice president level or higher must retain at least one-half of vested equity awards, less shares withheld or sold for tax withholding obligations, until the executive has accumulated shares of our common stock or other qualifying forms of equity having the value described below. The ownership value thresholds are as follows:

Leadership PositionValue of Shares
President and CEO6x base salary
EVP/SVP3x base salary
VP1x base salary

Further, in complement to the stock ownership policy all executives must hold at least 50% of any vested PRSUs (net of taxes) for a minimum of one year following vesting and delivery. All of the Company’s NEOs except for Mr. Brander have achieved these ownership targets as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

CEO Recommendations

During 2018 Mr. Trerotola provided recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation levels for our executive officers, other than for himself. These recommendations were based on his assessment of the executive officer’s relative experience, overall performance, and impact on the achievement of our financial and operational goals and strategic objectives, combined with perspective from the competitive review data. While the Compensation Committee took these recommendations under advisement, it independently evaluated the pay recommendations for each executive officer and made all final compensation decisions in accordance with its responsibilities as set forth in the Compensation Committee Charter.

Role of Compensation Consultants and Peer Data Review

Our Compensation Committee also obtains perspective from competitive data reviewed by FW Cook, the independent advisor to the Compensation Committee on matters of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the list of peer companies previously recommended by FW Cook, as updated to remove companies for acquisitions (Joy Global Inc. was removed from the prior list following its sale in 2017), to reflect the peers used by financial analysts and governance advisors covering Colfax and to represent our growth trajectory, revenue, market capitalization and overall scope and nature of operations. The peer group referenced in early 2018 was as follows:

Colfax Peer Group
Ametek Inc.Illinois Tool Works Inc.Snap-on Incorporated
Crane Co.Kennametal Inc.SPX Corporation
Dover CorporationLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.The Timken Company
Eaton Corporation plcPentair plcValmont Industries, Inc.
Flowserve CorporationRockwell Automation, Inc.Xylem Inc.
IDEX CorporationRoper Technologies, Inc.

In September 2018, the Compensation Committee removed Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc from the peer group for reference on executive pay decisions going forward.

While competitive review data drawn from this group is not used to “benchmark” the amount of compensation paid to the NEOs (or to our executives in general), the information was utilized by the Compensation Committee as one of many reference points to assist in its compensation decisions.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  31
Back to Contents

Independence of Compensation Consultant

At a meeting in March 2019, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of FW Cook in light of the SEC rules regarding conflicts of interest involving compensation consultants and NYSE listing standards regarding compensation consultant independence. The Compensation Committee requested and received a letter from FW Cook addressing conflicts of interest and independence, including specific factors enumerated in both relevant SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. The Compensation Committee discussed and considered these factors, and other factors it deemed relevant, and concluded that FW Cook is independent and that its work during 2018 did not raise any conflict of interest.

Compensation Program and Risk

As part of our continued appraisal of our compensation program, management, with oversight from the Compensation Committee, annually reviews our compensation policies and practices and the design of our overall compensation program in relation to our risk management practices and any potential risk-taking incentives. This assessment includes a review of the primary elements of our compensation program in light of potential risks:

Compensation Program Risk Considerations

Pay MixCompensation program includes an appropriate mix of short and long-term incentives, which mitigates the risk of undue focus on short-term targets while rewarding performance in areas that are key to our long-term success.
Base salaries are set at competitive levels to promote stability and provide a component of compensation that is not at risk.
Performance Metrics and GoalsDistinct performance metrics are used in both our short-term (AIP) and long-term incentive plans.
Our Annual Incentive Plan is designed with a payout scale (including a maximum cap) that supports our pay for performance philosophy, as set forth on page 23.
Long-Term IncentivesThe equity grant portion of our compensation program, combined with our stock ownership guidelines and stock holding requirements, is designed to align the long-term interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

We have controls and other policies in place that serve to limit excessive risk-taking behavior within our compensation program, including but not limited to the following:

Compensation Risk Mitigation Components

Compliance Risk MitigationOversight of our compensation process and procedures by the Compensation Committee, each member of which has been determined by the Board to be independent under applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards;
Internal controls over our financial reporting, which are maintained by management and reviewed as a part of our internal audit process and further reviewed and tested by our external auditors, as overseen by the Audit Committee; and
Audit Committee oversight and review of financial results and non-GAAP metrics used in certain components of our AIP and long-term incentives.
Personnel Risk MitigationImplementation of and training on Company-wide standards of conduct, as described on page 15 under “Standards of Conduct”.
Risk Mitigation PoliciesProvisions in the Company’s insider trading policy prohibiting hedging transactions that would allow the holder to limit or eliminate the risk of a decrease in the value of the Company’s securities;
A policy prohibiting pledging of Company shares after February 17, 2014; and
A clawback policy applicable to all executive officers.

The Compensation Committee reviewed with management the results of its assessment at a meeting in March 2019. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee concluded that the risks arising from Company compensation policies and practices for our employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Hedging Ban

Any director, officer or employee of the Company is prohibited from engaging in short sales, transactions in derivative securities (including put and call options), or other forms of hedging and monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars, equity swaps, exchange funds and forward sale contracts, that allow the holder to limit or eliminate the risk of a decrease in the value of the Company’s securities.

Pledging Policy

Our Board has adopted a policy that prohibits any director or executive officer from pledging as security under any obligation any shares of Colfax common stock that he or she directly or indirectly owns and controls (other than shares already pledged as of February 17, 2014). Any shares of Colfax common stock that were pledged prior to February 17, 2014 do not count toward our stock ownership requirements.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  32
Back to Contents

Clawback Policy

The Compensation Committee has adopted a clawback policy applicable to our executive officers. Under the policy, in the event the Company is required to restate its financial results due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws as generally applied, the Board will review all bonus payments made, including all bonus payments under our Annual Incentive Plan, and all performance-based equity compensation that was earned or vested on the basis of having met or exceeded financial results during the three years prior to the date that the Company determines such restatement is required.

If the Board determines that such payments or the amount of awards earned/vested would have been lower had they been determined or calculated based on such restated results, the Board will, to the extent permitted by governing law, seek to recoup for the benefit of the Company the value of such excess payments made to and/or equity awards earned by executive officers. The Board maintains discretion, to the extent permitted under applicable law, not to seek such recoupments if the Board determines, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, that under the specific circumstances it would not be appropriate to seek to recover such amounts. The Company may effect such recoupment by requiring executive officers to pay such amount(s) to the Company, by set-off, by reducing future compensation, or by such other means or combination of means as the Board determines to be appropriate.

Equity Grant Practice

The Compensation Committee has the authority to grant equity awards. The Company does not time the grant of equity awards around material, non-public information. Grant dates are determined either as of the date of Compensation Committee approval or on the date of a specific event, such as the date of hire or promotion, for certain executive officers. The target grant value is translated into a number of shares underlying each grant using a valuation formula that, for RSUs, incorporates a 15-day average closing price preceding the grant date, to avoid the potential volatility impact of using a single-day closing price, whereas PRSUs use the grant date accounting value as determined through Monte Carlo modeling. Grants of equity awards (other than to newly-appointed directors or newly-hired or promoted associates) are expected to be made annually by the Compensation Committee during “open-window” periods, which are the periods when officers and directors are not expressly prohibited from trading in shares of our common stock by our applicable policies. Equity awardseach person who is known to newly-appointedown beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock, each person currently serving as a director, each named executive officer (as listed below), and all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, to newly-hired or promoted associates, are expected to be made during an “open–window” period whenever possible,our knowledge, each person has sole dispositive and for newly-hired or promoted associates, are reviewed and approved at a regularly scheduled meeting ofvoting power over the Compensation Committee and made effective as of that date or as ofshares in the first date during the next “open-window” period.table.

 

The Compensation Committee has authorized the delegation of authority to our CEO for grants of equity awards to associates that are non-executive officers. The aggregate grant value of such equity awards may not exceed one-third of the total grant value of equity awards made during the fiscal year period, are subject to further restrictions on individual size, and are made pursuant to the terms of award agreement forms previously approved by the Board or the Compensation Committee. The effective grant date of these awards is the first day of the month following such review and approval by the CEO (and following the start date for any newly hired associates) or at a regularly scheduled Compensation Committee following such approval, subject to the “open-window” restrictions noted above. The Compensation Committee receives a report of any grants made pursuant to this delegated authority at each regularly scheduled meeting.

Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans by Executive Officers

Certain of our executive officers have adopted written stock trading plans in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act and our own Policy on Insider Trading and Compliance. A Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan is a written document that pre-establishes the amount (or ratio), prices, and dates (or range of possible dates) of future purchase or sales of our common stock. These plans are entered into during an open window period under our Policy on Insider Trading and Compliance. To date, certain NEOs have entered into such plans (i) to sell the percentage of vested shares necessary to satisfy applicable tax withholding obligations upon the vesting and delivery of PRSUs, or (ii) to exercise options that are approaching the end of their term.

Effect of Accounting and Tax Treatment on Compensation Decisions

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation that we may deduct in any one year with respect to any “covered employees”. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, the exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit that formerly existed for certain “performance-based” compensation was repealed (except for certain grandfathered compensation arrangements that were in effect as of November 2, 2017 and are not materially modified after such date). Accordingly, we expect that compensation awarded to our named executive officers in 2018 and subsequent years will not be deductible to the extent that it arises from awards and arrangements entered into or modified after November 2, 2017 and results in compensation above the threshold established under Section 162(m). Furthermore, the rules and regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) are complicated and subject to change. As such, there can be no assurance that any arrangements entered into or awarded prior to November 2, 2017 or any compensation paid in prior years will be fully tax deductible. Notwithstanding repeal of the exemption for “performance-based” compensation, the Compensation Committee intends to operate our executive compensation program in a manner that they believe best aligns compensation with performance and long-term shareholder value.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  33
Back to Contents
 COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee participated in the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, reviewing successive drafts and discussing the drafts with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s 2019 Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2018 by reference to the Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

Rhonda Jordan, Compensation Committee Chair

 Beneficial Owner  Shares Beneficially Owned  Percent of Class 

 5% Holder and Director

   

Mitchell P. Rales

   9,450,461(1)   6.0

 5% Holders

   

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

   16,546,189(2)   10.6

BlackRock, Inc.

   9,600,661(3)   6.1

The Vanguard Group

   9,032,587(4)   5.8

Steven M. Rales

   8,410,679(5)   5.4

 Directors

   
   

Patrick W. Allender

   317,776(6)(7)   * 

Thomas S. Gayner

   91,781(7)   * 

Rhonda L. Jordan

   111,866(7)(8)   * 

Liam J. Kelly

   17,365(7)   * 

A. Clayton Perfall

   86,644(7)(9)   * 

Philip A. Okala

   1,235(7)   * 

Didier Teirlinck

   41,373(7)   * 

Rajiv Vinnakota

38,654(7)*

Sharon Wienbar

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  34
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

Name and
Principal Position
 Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)(1)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)(3)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5)
 All Other
Compen-
sation($)(6)
 Total
($)
Matthew Trerotola 2018 1,049,000    1,676,000  422,927 3,147,927
President and Chief Executive Officer 2017 1,021,932 1,000,000   881,000  374,184 3,277,107
 2016 1,000,000 1,000,000 3,056,644 5,461,355 1,090,000  334,937 11,942,916
Christopher Hix 2018 570,962  999,987 1,000,002 640,000  29,260 3,240,211
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 2017 557,308  850,002 849,999 319,000  52,953 2,629,262
 2016 266,539 100,000 861,394 1,200,004 191,000  101,990 2,720,927
Daniel Pryor 2018 544,615  1,874,996 1,875,004 532,000  64,249 4,890,864
Executive Vice President, Strategy and Business Development 2017 525,962 500,000 874,983 874,997 382,000  52,078 3,210,019
 2016 515,000    342,000  45,360 902,360
Shyam Kambeyanda 2018 505,000 330,000 599,992 599,999 460,000  96,121 2,591,112
Senior Vice President, Colfax and ESAB President 2017 485,000 330,000 499,985 500,000 340,000  296,938 2,451,923
 2016 304,596 589,000 1,594,944 225,000   71,585 2,785,125
Ian Brander 2018 398,000(7)  650,012 349,999 355,000(8) (5,094) 82,198 1,830,115
Senior Vice President, Colfax and Howden President 2017 414,462  499,985 500,000 137,981 90,634 66,995 1,710,056
(1)For Mr. Trerotola, the amounts in this column for 2017 and 2016 represent the final two of the three installment payments of his cash signing bonus agreed to in 2015 when he joined the company. See “2015 CEO Succession” on pages 16-17 of our 2016 Proxy Statement as filed with the SEC on April 1, 2016. Similarly, for Mr. Hix, the amount represents his 2016 cash signing bonus. For Mr. Pryor the amount represents a performance-related bonus for 2017 in recognition of his contributions to the successful completion of the Colfax Fluid Handling sale. For Mr. Kambeyanda, the amounts represent for 2018 and 2017 the second and third of five installment payments of his cash signing bonus and for 2016, the first installment of such signing bonus as well as his full-year annual bonus at target as agreed upon at the time of his hiring.
(2)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of grants made to each NEO, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 21, 2019. For 2018 grants, the number of PRSUs (or, for Mr. Brander, PRSUs and RSUs) granted to each executive was determined by dividing 50% of the executive’s target aggregate long-term incentive value and calculating the award amount in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See “Long-Term Incentives” above on page 29. Assuming the maximum acheivement of the performance goals applicable to the PRSUs, the grant date value of the PRSUs granted to the NEOs in 2018 would have been $1,999,974, $3,749,992, $1,199,984, and $698,000 for Messrs. Hix, Pryor, Kambeyanda, and Brander respectively.
(3)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of grants made to each NEO, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2019. For 2018 grants, the number of options was determined by dividing 50% of the executive’s target aggregate long-term incentive value by the Black Scholes-based option value based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price for stock option awards equals the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. See “Long-Term Incentives” above on page 29.
(4)Amounts represent the payouts pursuant to our Annual Incentive Plan. For a discussion of the performance metrics on which the 2018 Annual Incentive Plan was based, including the weighting for each performance metric and the actual percentage achievement of the financial performance targets, see “Annual Incentive Plan” above on page 26.
(5)Amount represents -£4,000 or -$5,094 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018. This amount is the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of Mr. Brander’s accumulated benefit under a closed pension benefit plan from the pension plan measurement date used for financial statement reporting purposes in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2018. For additional details regarding this plan, see the Pension Benefits table and narrative that follows such table below.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  35
(6)Amounts set forth in this column for 2018 consist of the following:
  49,339(7)* 
 NameCompany
401(k)/Deferred
Compensation
Plan
Match and
Contribution
($)(a)
Auto
Allowance
($)(b)
Financial
Services
($)(c)
Aircraft
Usage
($)(d)
Relocation
($)(e)
Supplemental
Long-Term
Disability
Premiums
($)(f)
Accident
Insurance
($)(g)
Howden
Retirement
Plan
Company
Contribution
($)(h)
Medical
Care
Supplement
($)(i)
Total
($)
 Mr. Trerotola113,40620,00010,015279,505422,927
 Mr. Hix29,26029,260
 Mr. Pryor52,0788,65264,249
 Mr. Kambeyanda43,8904,50041,22196,121
 Mr. Brander15,2837,18323241,1813,03682,198

 Named Executive Officer and Director

  (a)Amounts represent the aggregate Company match and Company contribution made by Colfax during 2018 to such NEO’s 401(k) plan account, and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan account. See the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table and accompanying narrative for additional information on the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
(b)For Mr. Trerotola, amount represents an annual cash allowance for car-related expenses pursuant to his employment contract. For Mr. Brander, the amount represents an annual cash allowance for car-related expenses pursuant to his service contract in the amount of £12,000 or $15,283 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
(c)Amount represents amounts for financial planning services as reimbursed by the Company during 2018.
(d)Amount represents Company expenses incurred for private plane usage in 2018. The Company is billed directly for the charter flight services used for Mr. Trerotola’s personal travel. The imputed income to Mr. Trerotola for these flights as calculated under the tax rules was $38,932 in 2018, based on the SIFL rates promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company does not gross-up or make whole Mr. Trerotola for the income imputed to his use of chartered flights.
(e)Amounts represents relocation expenses reimbursed by the Company pursuant to the terms of his hire, which include such costs as temporary housing, storage, and relocation assistance.
(f)Amount represents £5,640, or $7,183 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
(g)Amount represents £182, or $232 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
(h)Amount represents the annual employer contribution of £32,335, or $41,181 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018. So long as Mr. Brander contributes 5% of his annual salary to the retirement plan, as he did during 2018, Howden contributes 10% of Mr. Brander’s annual salary. Mr. Brander does not have the ability to withdraw funds from this account before retirement and upon his retirement Mr. Brander will receive the value of his investments in the fund. There is no guaranteed distribution amount based on service years or age. Amounts contributed to the retirement plan are at risk and are invested via direction from Mr. Brander to the plan provider.
(i)Amount represents a private medical insurance premium and executive physical of £2,383 in aggregate, or $3,035 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
(7)

Matthew L. Trerotola

For Mr. Brander, amount represents £312,500 or $398,000 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
(8)For Mr. Brander, amount represents £273,000 or $355,000 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  36

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2018

The following table sets forth information with respect to grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers during 2018:

   Estimated
Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated
Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Grant
Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
   ThresholdTargetMaximum ThresholdTargetMaximumOptionsAwardsOption
NameAward TypeGrant Date($)($)($) (#)(#)(#)(#)(3)($/Sh)Awards ($)(4)
Matthew L. TrerotolaAnnual Incentive Plan330,0001,320,0003,300,000       
            
Christopher M. HixAnnual Incentive Plan115,000460,0001,150,000       
PRSUs3/08/2018    14,74229,48558,970  999,987
Stock Options3/08/2018       96,71233.411,000,002
Daniel A. PryorAnnual Incentive Plan110,000440,0001,100,000       
PRSUs3/08/2018    27,64255,285110,570  1,874,996
Stock Options3/08/2018       181,33533.411,875,004
Shyam KambeyandaAnnual Incentive Plan95,500382,500956,500       
PRSUs3/08/2018    8,84517,69135,382  599,992
Stock Options3/08/2018       58,02733.41599,999
Ian BranderAnnual Incentive Plan(5)76,416305,664764,160       
PRSUs3/08/2018    5,16010,32020,640  349,999
RSUs(6)3/08/2018     9,144   300,012
Stock Options3/08/2018       33,84933.41350,000
(1)Amounts represent the possible payouts under our Annual Incentive Plan. Threshold estimated possible payouts incorporate a 0.5 IPF, target estimated possible payouts incorporate a 1.0 IPF and maximum estimated possible payouts incorporate the 250% maximum payout cap under the Annual Incentive Plan. For a discussion of the performance metrics and actual results and payouts under the plan for fiscal 2018 see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above, respectively.
(2)Amounts represent potential shares issued under performance-based restricted stock unit awards. The PRSUs may be earned at the end of the performance period upon certification by the Compensation Committee of the performance level that has been met and cliff vest at the end of the three-year performance period, if earned. Once vested, at least 50% of the shares delivered pursuant to the PRSUs (net of shares withheld or sold for taxes) must be held for an additional one-year period.
(3)Amounts represent stock option awards that vest ratably over three years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, based on continued service.
(4)The amounts shown in this column represent the full grant date fair value of grants made to each NEO, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. PRSUs are valued based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions associated with these awards as of the grant date and such calculation is consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost recognized over the service period determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures.
(5)For Mr. Brander, amount represents £60,000, £240,000, and £600,000 for the threshold, target, and maximum possible payouts, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.
(6)Amounts represent restricted stock units that vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  37

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018 Fiscal Year-End

The following table shows, as of December 31, 2018, the number of outstanding stock options, performance-based restricted stock unit awards and, for Messrs. Hix, Kambeyanda, and Brander, restricted stock unit awards held by the named executive officers:

 Option Awards Stock Awards
      Equity Incentive Plan Awards
NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date(1)
 Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(4)
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(5)
Matthew L. Trerotola179,553359,06739.547/23/2022     
 559,56323.741/3/2023     
      204,6284,276,725
Christopher M. Hix83,07441,53726.566/30/2023     
 23,86947,74040.472/12/2024     
 96,71296,71233.413/7/2025     
      26,426552,303
      50,5131,055,722
Daniel A. Pryor18,78535.602/22/2019     
 23,66942.252/17/2020     
 144,64852.797/28/2020     
 39,33678,67452.022/15/2022     
 114,61326.5111/15/2022     
 24,57149,14440.472/12/2024     
 181,33533.413/7/2025     
      14,373300,396
      90,0981,883,048
Shyam Kambeyanda16,4298,21524.965/12/2023     
 14,04028,08340.472/12/2024     
 58,02733.413/7/2025     
      61,2741,280,627
      30,060628,254
Ian Brander7,02235.602/22/2019     
 14,79342.252/17/2020     
 15,02468.232/16/2021     
 27,04354,08952.022/15/2022     
 57,30726.5111/15/2022     
 14,04028,08340.472/12/2024     
 33,84933.413/7/2025     
      16,331341,318
      22,689474,200

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  38
(1)The vesting date of unvested stock option awards is set forth beside each option expiration date in the following chart. Note that the vesting date provided reflects when the options fully vest. Stock option awards vest ratably over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date except as follows: For Mr. Trerotola, options granted on July 24, 2015 and January 4, 2016, vest in equal amounts on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. For Messrs. Pryor and Brander, the options granted on February 16, 2015 vest in equal amounts on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date.
  1,053,737(10)* 

 Named Executive Officers

  Option Grant DateOption Expiration DateOption Full Vesting Date (options vest over
three year period except as noted above)
2/16/20152/15/20222/16/2020
7/24/20157/23/20227/24/2020
11/16/201511/15/202211/16/2018
1/4/20161/3/20231/4/2021
5/13/20165/12/20235/13/2019
7/1/20166/30/20237/1/2019
2/14/20172/12/20242/13/2020
3/8/20183/7/20253/8/2021
(2)

Christopher M. Hix

420,459(10)*For Mr. Hix, the amounts represent (i) 12,012 restricted stock units that are the remaining portion of the RSU portion of his 2016 signing bonus, which vests two equal portions on July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020 and (i) 14,414 PRSUs that were earned upon certification by the Compensation Committee that the performance metric for these awards had been met and that vest in two equal installments on July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020 pending continued service with the Company.
For Mr. Pryor, the amounts represent 14,373 PRSUs that will vest on November 16, 2019 pending continued service with the Company.
For Mr. Kambeyanda, the amounts represent (i) 45,518 RSUs that vest ratably over two years, beginning on May 13, 2019, which is the outstanding restricted stock unit award portions of his 2016 signing bonus and (ii) 15,756 PRSUs from his intiial long-term incentive award that were earned upon certification by the Compensation Committee that the performance metric for these awards had been met and that vest in two equal installments on May 13, 2019 and May 13, 2020 pending continued service with the Company.
For Mr. Brander, the amounts represent (i) 9,144 RSUs that vest on March 8, 2019 and (ii) 7,187 PRSUs that will vest on November 16, 2019 pending continued service with the Company.
(3)The amounts shown in this column represent the market value of the unvested PRSUs or restricted stock units, as applicable, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2018, which was $20.90 per share, multiplied by the number of units, respectively, for each unvested award.
(4)The amounts shown in this column reflect unearned PRSUs as of December 31, 2018. If earned, these PRSUs are then subject to an additional service-based vesting period.
The remaining amounts for Messrs. Pryor and Brander and for all other NEOs reflect awards made in 2017 and 2018 and show the target amount of PRSUs that may be earned at the end of the performance period upon certification by the Compensation Committee, which awards would cliff vest at the end of the three-year performance period, if earned. Once vested, at least 50% of the shares delivered pursuant to the PRSUs (net of shares withheld or sold for taxes) must be held for an additional one-year period. For 2018, these amounts are reflected in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2018” table above under the column “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” and for 2017 are reflected in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2017” table in the Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting.
PRSU grants made to Messrs. Pryor and Brander in February 2015 were cancelled without any shares being issued following the end of their performance period, which concluded as of the end of the fiscal year, and are not reflected in this table.
(5)The amounts shown in this column represent the market value of the unearned PRSUs based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2018, which was $20.90 per share, multiplied by the number of units, respectively, for each unvested and unearned performance stock award.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  39
 
Back to Contents

Daniel A. Pryor

731,000(10)(11)*

Employment Agreements and Executive Officer Severance PlanShyam Kambeyanda

245,555(10)*

Brady Shirley

113,020(10)*

 

Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor are party to our current form of employment agreement for executive officers, which was adopted by the Company on September 15, 2010.

Mr. Hix’s letter agreement, entered into upon his hire, provides for severance and change in control benefits primarily commensurate with those provided under our employment agreements. Mr. Kambeyanda is party to a letter agreement that specifies his starting annual salary and minimum target bonus. Mr. Brander is party to a service agreement with Howden Group Ltd., which he entered into prior to our acquisition of the Howden business in 2012.

We also maintain an Executive Officer Severance Plan, which provides for severance benefits upon a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason for executive officers who are not otherwise contractually entitled to severance compensation. The Executive Officer Severance Plan does not provide for change in control benefits. Mr. Kambeyanda is the only NEO subject to this plan.

Form of Employment Agreement

On September 15, 2010, the Company adopted a new form of employment agreement for executive officers. Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor are each parties to employment agreements based on this form, which, except for Mr. Trerotola (who has a three-year term), currently has a two-year term that is automatically extended unless the Board or the executive provides written notice to terminate the automatic extension provision. In addition, in the event we undergo a “change in control” (as described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”) during the term of the employment agreements, the agreements will be automatically extended to the second anniversary of the change in control. Each officer’s base salary may not be reduced below the amount previously in effect without the written agreement of the executive.

With respect to the benefits payable to each executive under these agreements upon a change in control of Colfax, the benefits are only paid upon a “double trigger,” meaning a change in control event must occur and the executive must either be terminated without cause by Colfax (or its successor) or the executive must resign for good reason. In entering into these arrangements, the Company wanted to ensure the continued dedication of these executive officers, notwithstanding the possibility of a change in control, and to retain such officers in our employ after any such transaction. We believe that, should the possibility of a change in control arise, Colfax should be able to receive and rely upon our officers’ advice as to the best interests of the Company and without the concern that such officer might be distracted by the personal uncertainties and risks created by the potential change in control. In the event, however, that such officer is actually terminated during the period beginning three months prior to a change in control event or within a certain period of time following the change in control (or prior to the end of the term of the applicable employment agreement should the change of control not be consummated), which termination may be out of their control (i.e., by the successor company or management), we believe that the officers should be compensated for their efforts in positioning Colfax for the possibility of an acquisition event. Further, any bonus payment paid in conjunction with the termination of a NEO will be based upon the performance of the Company, as stipulated in the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan. Additional information on certain benefits provided under the form of employment agreement in certain terminations or in connection with a change of control is discussed below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table provides information regarding (i) the vesting of earned PRSUs for Messrs. Trerotola, Pryor, and Brander, (ii) the vesting of new hire RSU awards for Messrs. Hix and Kambeyanda, and (iii) Mr. Pryor’s option exercises during 2018. The number of shares acquired upon exercise or vesting and the value realized before payment of any taxes and broker commissions is reflected below. Value realized represents the product of the number of shares received upon exercise or vesting and the closing market priceAll of our common stock on the exercise or vesting date, less the exercise price for options.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  40

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal 2018

 Option Awards Stock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on Exercise

(#)
Value Realized
on Exercise

($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting

(#)
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
Matthew TrerotolaN/AN/A 37,9361,279,581
Chris HixN/AN/A 6,006184,084
Daniel Pryor17,226200,855 28,752858,746
Shyam KambeyandaN/AN/A 2,62685,082
Ian BranderN/AN/A 10,145299,569

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Effective January 1, 2016, we established the Colfax Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Nonqualified Plan”) to provide certain select members of management and other highly compensated employees, including each of the NEOs, with an opportunity to defer a stated percentage of their base compensation or their bonus compensation without regard to the compensation limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code for our 401(k) plan. We established the Nonqualified Plan to allow these individuals to contribute toward retirement on a tax-effective basis in a manner that is consistent with other Colfax employees who are not limited by the Internal Revenue Code limits. The plan is “unfunded,” meaning there are no assets segregated for the exclusive benefit of plan participants.

The Nonqualified Plan allows the NEOs to defer up to 50% of their base salaries and up to 75% of their bonus compensation. In addition, during 2017 we matched up to 4% of all excess deferrals by the NEOs and provided a 2% Company contribution. Our NEOs vest in these Company contributions to the Nonqualified Plan on the same terms as under the Company’s 401(k) plan.

Deferrals under the Nonqualified Plan are notionally invested among a number of different mutual funds, insurance company separate accounts, indexed rates or other measurement funds, which are selected periodically by the plan administrator to best match the funds offered in the qualified 401(k) plan. Each participating NEO can allocate his deferrals among these notional fund investment options and may change elections at any time by making a change of election with the plan administrator. Colfax notionally invests its match and contribution amounts in the same investment options in the same amounts and allocations as the reference funds selected by the officer.

Simultaneously with the executive’s election to defer amounts under the Nonqualified Plan, the executive must elect the time and form of payment for the deferred amounts, which may generally be either a lump sum distribution or in quarterly installments payable over a period of one to ten years following a specified date (that must be at least one year following the end of the year to which the officer’s deferral election relates) or at least six months following the officer’s separation from service. Limited changes to deferral elections are permitted in accordance with the terms of the Nonqualified Plan. If no election is made, the benefit will be paid in a lump sum on the last day of the month which occurs six months after the executive’s separation from service. Deferred amounts may alternatively be paid out in a lump sum in the event of an executive’s death or disability or in the event of an unforeseeable financial emergency, Furthermore, in the event the executive’s account balance at the time of his or her separation from service is less than $15,000, payment of the account balance will be made in a lump sum on or before the later of (i) December 31 of the calendar year of separation, or (ii) the date 2.5 months after the executive’s separation from service.

The Company also maintains the Colfax Corporation Excess Benefit Plan (the “Excess Benefit Plan”) which was frozen to new participants and future new deferrals on December 31, 2015. Like the Nonqualified Plan, the Excess Benefit Plan is an unfunded non-qualified deferred compensation plan in which Mr. Pryor holds an account balances. Like the Nonqualified Plan, amounts deferred under the Excess Benefit Plan are notionally invested in offered measurement funds as selected by the plan participant and will be distributed in accordance with participant elections and the terms of the Excess Benefit Plan following a participant’s separation from service, death or disability.

Mr. Brander does not participate in either the Nonqualified Plan or the Excess Benefit Plan.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  41

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Name Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)
 Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(2)
 Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
 Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
Matthew L. Trerotola 96,500 99,300 21,864  480,845
Christopher M. Hix 12,760 15,794 3,540  116,206
Daniel A. Pryor 55,597 39,097 25,515  617,852
Shyam Kambeyanda 25,250 34,291 10,890  226,589

(1)With respect to each applicable NEO, amounts represent deferred salary and deferred bonus amounts that are reported in the Summary Compensation Table above under the applicable column.
(2)All amounts reported in this column for each applicable NEO are reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above.

Pension Benefits- Mr. Brander

Mr. Brander previously participated in a pension plan provided by Howden Group Ltd., the Howden Group Pension Plan. Members of the Howden Group Pension Plan stopped accruing benefits on September 30, 2006. The pension amount available to each participant under the Howden Group Pension Plan is based on the participant’s years of service and his or her “Final Pensionable Earnings.” For purposes of the Howden Group Pension Plan, “Final Pensionable Earnings” means the participant’s base annual salary as of the date accrualsceased under the Howden Group Pension Plan, plus an allowance for fluctuating earnings for overtime and shift allowances, less an amount equal to 1.5 times the Lower Earnings Limit (a figure determined by the UK tax authorities).

The pension formula under the plan is one sixtieth of the Final Pensionable Earnings multiplied by the number years of pensionable service for each participant.

All pension amounts under the Howden Group Pension Plan are paid monthly following retirement.

2018 Pension Benefits

Name Plan Name Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)(1)
 Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit
($)(2)
  Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
Ian Brander Howden Group Pension Plan 19.4 668,640(3)  

(1)Represents the number of years of pensionable service for Mr. Brander under the Howden Group Pension Plan. The number of years of pensionable service represents Mr. Brander’s actual years of service with the company prior to the plan freeze date in 2006.
(2)Amounts represent the actuarial present value of Mr. Brander’s accumulated benefit under the plan, computed as of the date used for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to our 2017 financial statements and assuming the normal plan retirement age of 65. The value quoted is the full Howden Group Pension Plan transfer value that would be paid in full upon transfer to Mr. Brander.
(3)Amount represents £525,000 or $668,640 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The information below describes relevant employment agreement, severance plan and equity plan provisions for payments upon termination or change in control and sets forth the amount of compensation that could have been received by each of the NEOs in the event such executive’s employment had terminated under the various applicable triggering events described below as of December 31, 2018. The benefits discussed below are in addition to those generally available to all salaried employees, such as distributions under the 401(k) plan, Howden Group Pension Plan, health care benefits and disability benefits or vested amounts payable under the Nonqualified Plan and Excess Benefit Plan described above. In addition, these benefits do not take into account any arrangements that we may provide in connection with an actual separation from service or a change in control. Due to the number of different factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided in connection with these events, actual amounts payable to any of the NEOs should a separation from service or change-in-control occur during the year will likely differ, perhaps significantly, from the amounts reported below. Factors that could affect such amounts include the timing during the year of the event, the Company’s stock price, and the target amounts payable under annual and long-term incentive arrangements that are in place at the time of the event.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  42

Employment Agreements

Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements with each of Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor, each executive is entitled to the following severance payments or benefits in the event his employment is terminated by us without “cause” or the executive resigns for “good reason” (each as described below):

For Mr. Trerotola, the (i) payment of his base salary then in effect for 24 months following termination, (ii) an amount equal to 200% of his target annual incentive bonus for the year of termination paid in equal installments over the 24 months following termination, and (iii) COBRA coverage for 24 months or until he becomes eligible for coverage by another company or is no longer eligible for COBRA;
For Mr. Pryor, a lump sum payment equal to one times the executive’s base salary in effect and his target annual incentive compensation for the year of termination (or, if greater, the average of the two highest actual annual incentive payments made to the executive during the last three years); and
For each of Messrs. Trerotola and Pryor, a lump sum payment equal to the executive’s pro rata annual incentive compensation for the year of termination subject to the performance criteria having been met for that year under the Annual Incentive Plan.

In the event the executive terminates employment without “cause” or for “good reason” within three months prior to a “change in control event” (as described below), or two years after a “change in control”, each executive is entitled to the following severance payments or benefits:

a lump sum payment equal to two times the executive’s base salary in effect and his or her target annual incentive compensation for the year of termination (or, if greater, the average of the two highest actual incentive payments made to the executive during the last three years);
a lump sum payment equal to the executive’s pro rata annual incentive compensation for the year of termination subject to the performance criteria having been met for that year under the Annual Incentive Plan; and
all equity awards will immediately vest, with any performance objectives applicable to performance-based equity awards deemed to have been met at the greater of (i) the target level at the date of termination, and (ii) actual performance at the date of termination.

In each case described above, the executive’s right to the severance payments and benefits is conditioned on the executive’s execution of a waiver and release agreement in favor of Colfax. In addition, each employment agreement contains standard confidentiality covenants, non-disparagement covenants, non-competition covenants and non-solicitation covenants.

In the event that any payment or benefit to the executives pursuant to the employment agreements or otherwise constitute excess parachute payments under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code such that they would trigger the excise tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, such payments are to be reduced so that the excise tax provisions are not triggered, but only upon determination that the after-tax value of the termination benefits calculated with the restriction described above exceed the value of those calculated without such restriction.

Each agreement further provides that, in the event it is determined that the willful actions of the executive have resulted in a material misstatement or omission in any report or statement filed by Colfax with the SEC, or material fraud against Colfax, Colfax is entitled to recover all or any portion of any award or payment made to the executive.

For purposes of the employment agreements, the following terms generally have the following meanings:

“cause”means conviction of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude, willful commission of any act of theft, fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation against Colfax or its subsidiaries or willful and continued failure of the executive to substantially perform his or her duties;
“change in control”means:
a transaction or series of transactions pursuant to which any person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the voting power of the common stock of Colfax then outstanding;
during any two-year consecutive period, individuals who at the beginning of the period constitute the Board (together with any new directors approved by at least two-thirds of the directors at the beginning of the period or subsequently approved) cease to constitute a majority of the Board;
a merger, sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Colfax or certain acquisitions of the assets or stock by Colfax of another entity in which there is a change in control of Colfax; or
a liquidation or dissolution of Colfax.
“change in control event” means the earlier to occur of a “change in control” or the execution of an agreement by Colfax providing for a change in control.
“good reason” means:
upon or following a change in control, the assignment to the executive of duties materially inconsistent with his or her position or any alteration of an executive’s duties, responsibilities and authorities, and then only if such adjustments or assignments are not the result of the conclusion by a significantly larger successor entity and its board of directors that such executive’s role needs to be altered;
the requirement for the executive to relocate his or her principal place of business at least 35 miles from his or her current place of business;
Colfax’s failure to obtain agreement from any successor to fully assume its obligations to the executive under the terms of the agreement; or
any other failure by Colfax to perform its material obligations under, or breach of Colfax of any material provision of, the employment agreement.

Trerotola Pro-Rata Vesting Provisions

In addition, for Mr. Trerotola his CEO Performance Stock Unit Agreements provide that if he is terminated by the Company without “cause” (and not on account of disability) or resigns for “good reason” his outstanding performance-based equity awards shall vest pro-ratably only if the performance objectives are achieved as of the end of the performance period.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  43

Hix Letter Agreement

Mr.  Hix is subject to a letter agreement entered into with the Company upon his hire. Pursuant to that letter agreement, severance in an amount equal to the sum of his base salary and target bonus is to be provided in the event of a termination without “cause” or for “good reason”, with severance of two times such amount to be provided in connection with such a termination within three months prior to or two years after a “change in control”.

Executive Officer Severance Plan

Mr. Kambeyanda is a participant in our Executive Officer Severance Plan, which provides for severance benefits upon termination without cause or for good reason for executive officers who are not otherwise contractually entitled to severance compensation pursuant to a separate agreement with the Company. Severance provided in the event of termination without “cause” or for “good reason” (each defined as in the form of employment agreement) is a lump sum payment equal to one times the executive’s base salary in effect and a pro rata payment of his or her target annual incentive compensation for the year of termination. The Executive Officer Severance Plan does not provide for any additional change in control benefits.

Brander’s Service Agreement

If Mr. Brander’s service agreement is terminated without at least twelve month’s prior written notice he is entitled to payment of twelve month’s severance equivalent to his base salary in effect at that time.

Equity Awards

The vesting of outstanding equity awards, other than performance-based awards, accelerates in full upon the death or total and permanent disability of the grantee or, unless assumed or substituted as discussed below, upon a “corporate transaction” (as defined below). The vesting of the outstanding PRSUs accelerates in full upon the death or total and permanent disability of the grantee only if and when the performance criteria for such award are achieved as of the end of the performance period upon certification of the same by the Compensation Committee, or immediately if the performance period has already ended and the Compensation Committee has certified that the performance criteria have been achieved. The outstanding PRSUs will terminate and cease to vest upon a “corporate transaction,” unless prior to the corporate transaction the achievement of the performance criteria is certified by the Compensation Committee, in which case the vesting for the award will accelerate in full unless assumed or substituted as discussed below. While these benefits are available to all of our equity plan participants equally, pursuant to SEC requirements, we have included these acceleration benefits in the table below. In addition, in the event of termination of service other than for death, disability or cause, any stock option awards will remain exercisable to the extent vested for 90 days after termination of service.

A “corporate transaction” under any outstanding equity awards is generally defined as:

the dissolution or liquidation of the Company or a merger, consolidation, or reorganization of the Company with one or more other entities in which we are not the surviving entity;
a sale of substantially all of our assets to another person or entity; or
any transaction which results in any person or entity, other than persons who are stockholders or affiliates immediately prior to the transaction, owning 50% or more of the combined voting power of all classes of our stock.

Accelerated vesting upon a “corporate transaction” will not occur to the extent that provision is made in writing in connection with the corporate transaction for the assumption or continuation of the outstanding awards, or for the substitution of such outstanding awards for similar awards relating to the stock of the successor entity, or a parent or subsidiary of the successor entity, with appropriate adjustments to the number of shares of stock that would be delivered and the exercise price, grant price or purchase price relating to any such award. If an award is assumed or substituted in connection with a corporate transaction and the holder is terminated without cause within a year following a change in control, the award will fully vest and may be exercised in full, to the extent applicable, beginning on the date of such termination and for the one-year period immediately following such termination or for such longer period as the compensation committee shall determine.

Estimate of Payments

The following table provides information related to compensation payable to each NEO assuming termination of such executive’s employment on December 31, 2018, or assuming a change of control or corporate transaction with corresponding qualifying termination occurred on December 31, 2018. Amounts also assume the price of our common stock was $20.90, the closing price on December 31, 2018, the last trading day of the fiscal year.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  44

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

Executive Matthew L.
Trerotola
 Christopher
M. Hix
 Daniel A.
Pryor
 Shyam
Kambeyanda
 Ian
Brander
 
Employment Agreement/Severance Plan Benefits:
Termination without “cause” or “good reason”           
Payment Over 24 Months/Lump Sum Payment(1) 4,752,000 1,035,000 990,000 510,000 416,000(5) 
Pro Rata Incentive Compensation(2) 1,320,000  440,000 382,500  
Termination in connection with a “change of control”           
Lump Sum Payment 4,752,000 2,070,000 1,980,000 510,000 416,000 
Pro Rata Incentive Compensation(2) 1,320,000  440,000 382,500  
Accelerated Stock Options(2) 8,282,168 2,379,238 5,678,584 1,308,855 2,656,285 
Accelerated PRSUs(3) 4,276,725 1,356,974 2,635,845 957,554 1,124,629 
Accelerated RSUs(3)  251,051  951,326 191,110 
NQDC Plans/Pension(4) 480,845 116,206 617,852 226,589 668,640 
(1)For Mr. Trerotola, the amount is paid over the 24 months following termination. For the other NEOs, the amount is paid as a lump sum.
(2)Assumes achievement at target.
(2)In addition to accelerated vesting pursuant to the employment agreements, stock options accelerate upon death, total and permanent disability, and, unless assumed or substituted as discussed above, upon a “corporate transaction” as defined above.
(3)Under the employment agreements, in the event of a termination in connection with a change in control, the performance objectives applicable to PRSUs will be deemed to have been met at the greater of (i) the target level at the date of termination, and (ii) actual performance at the date of termination. In addition to accelerated vesting pursuant to the employment agreements, RSUs, and PRSUs for which the performance criteria have been certified as achieved, accelerate upon death, total and permanent disability and, unless assumed or substituted as discussed above, upon a “corporate transaction” as defined above.
(4)Amounts represent the aggregate balance of the NEO’s Excess Benefit Plan or Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation account as of December 31, 2018. For more details on these plans, see “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” above. For Mr. Brander, amount represents the transfer value of his accumulated pension benefit as of December 31, 2018. See “Pension Benefits- Mr. Brander” above.
(5)Amount represents £320,000 or $416,000 in U.S. dollars, calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2018.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  45
CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our median compensated associate and the annual total compensation of Mr. Matthew Trerotola, our President & Chief Executive Officer. The pay ratio included in this section is a reasonable estimate calculated in a matter consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

For 2018:

The annual total compensation of the median compensated of all of our employees (other than our CEO) was $34,386; and
The annual total compensation of Mr. Trerotola, as presented in the Summary Compensation Table, was $3,147,927.

Based on this information, for 2018 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Trerotola, our Chief Executive Officer, to the annual total compensation of our median compensated employee was 91.5 to one.

The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

To identify our median-compensated employee, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of this “median employee”:

We determined that, as of December 31, 2018, our employee population consisted of approximately 15,500 persons, of whom approximately 2,100 were employed in the United States and approximately 13,400 were employed outside the United States, based on our payroll records;
We selected December 31, 2018 as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee”;
We annualized the compensation of associates employed by us for less than a full fiscal year;
Based on payroll data for all employees aside from those noted as excluded above, we used annualized base salary or base pay rate to identify our median employee, who was a full-time, salaried associate in the Czech Republic; and
Once the median employee was identified, we calculated the elements of this employee’s compensation for 2018 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-X, resulting in annual total compensation of $34,386 based on the exchange rate in effect as of December 31, 2018.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  46
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table summarizes Colfax Corporation’s equity plan information as of December 31, 2018.

Plan Category Number of
securities to
be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options and rights
(a)(1)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
(b)(2)
 Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column(a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by Company stockholders 6,034,400 $ 37.49 6,092,975.5
Equity compensation plans not approved by Company stockholders 0 0 0
(1)Includes 1,142,633 shares granted under the either the 2016 or 2008 Plan that are issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units, including 647,163 shares that could be issued at the end of the requisite performance period for outstanding performance-based restricted stock units. This number assumes shares will be issued at the maximum vesting amount for outstanding performance-based RSUs.
(2)The weighted average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon outstanding RSUs vesting, which have no exercise price.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  47
Proposal 3Approval of Named Executive Officers’ Compensation, on a Non-Binding Advisory Basis (“Say-on-Pay”)

We are asking our stockholders to cast an advisory vote at our Annual Meeting to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking that you vote on the following advisory resolution:

RESOLVED, that the 2018 compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is herebyAPPROVED.

Though the vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors value your opinion and will consider the outcome of the vote in establishing our compensation philosophy and making future compensation decisions. At this time, we intend to seek stockholder approval of our executive compensation program on an annual basis.

WHY YOU SHOULD APPROVE OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

As discussed in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we believe our compensation programs and practices are appropriate and effective in implementing our compensation philosophy, and our focus remains on linking compensation to performance while aligning the interests of management with those of our stockholders.

VOTE REQUIRED

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve the advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officers.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board unanimously recommends that you voteFORProposal 3, which is advisory approval of Colfax’s named executive compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. We strongly urge stockholders to review our entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the accompanying tables, which provides complete information on the compensation awarded to the named executive officers and the reasoning supporting those awards.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  48
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 26, 2019 (unless otherwise specified), with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person who is known to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock, each person currently serving as a director, each

nominee for director, each named executive officer (as listed below), and all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated,group (17 persons)

12,818,996(10)8.2

*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%

(1)

Includes 1,142,297 shares of common stock held by Mr. Mitchell P. Rales’ Revocable Trust and IRA, 6,000,000 shares of common stock held by limited liability companies of which Mr. Mitchell P. Rales is the trustee of the sole member, 679,264 shares of common stock held by the Mitchell P. Rales Family Trust, 28,900 shares of common stock held in trust for his daughters and 1,600,000 shares of common stock underlying tangible equity units (“TEUs”) that may be settled into shares of common stock by the holder at any time. The number of shares of common stock underlying Mr. Mitchell P. Rales’ TEUs is based on the amount that may be acquired if the prepaid stock purchase contracts were settled prior to our knowledge, eachthe second scheduled trading day immediately preceding January 15, 2022. The actual number of shares of common stock the reporting person may acquire will depend on when the prepaid stock purchase contracts are settled. Mr. Mitchell P. Rales has sole dispositive and voting power overand sole dispositive power with respect to 7,878,365 shares of common stock and the 1,600,000 shares in the table.

Beneficial OwnerShares Beneficially Owned Percent of Class 
5% Holder and Director    
Mitchell P. Rales12,592,707(1)10.6%
5% Holders    
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.13,988,736(2)11.9%
Steven M. Rales11,690,749(3)9.9%
BDT Capital Partners, LLC11,054,191(4)9.4%
Principal Global Investors, LLC7,028,102(5)5.9%
The Vanguard Group7,013,703(6)5.9%
Directors    
Patrick W. Allender298,540(7)(8)* 
Thomas S. Gayner73,890(8)* 
Rhonda L. Jordan101,493(8)(9)* 
A. Clayton Perfall59,197(8)(10)* 
Rajiv Vinnakota45,334(8)* 
Didier Teirlinck12,533(8)* 
Sharon Wienbar22,351(8)* 
Named Executive Officers and Directors    
Matthew L. Trerotola262,036 * 
Named Executive Officers    
Christopher M. Hix169,056 * 
Daniel A. Pryor549,297(11)(12)*��
Shyam Kambeyanda104,457(11)(13)* 
Ian Brander143,402(11)(14)* 
All of our directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)14,443,231(11)12.0% 
*Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%
(1)Includes 10,262,869 shares held directly and by a revocable trust, 19,388 shares held by Capital Yield Corporation, of which Mr. Mitchell Rales and Mr. Steven Rales are the sole stockholders, 854,750 shares held by the Mitchell P. Rales Family Trust, 11,500 shares held by a trust for his daughter, 4,200 shares held as custodian for his daughters, and 1,440,000 tangible equity units (TEUs) that may be settled into shares of common stock by the holder at any time.The number of shares of common stock underlying Mr.  Mitchell Rales’ TEUs is based on the amount that may be acquired if the prepaid stock purchase contracts were settled prior to January 15, 2020. The actual number of shares the reporting person may acquire will depend on when the prepaid stock purchase contracts are settled. Mr. Mitchell Rales has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 11,191,811 shares of common stock and the 1,440,000 TEUs, and shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 19,388 shares of common stock. 7,000,000of common stock underlying TEUs. 6,000,000 shares of Colfax common stock are pledged to secure a line of credit. This entity and Mr. Mitchell P. Rales are in compliance with this line of credit. The business address of Mr. Mitchell Rales, and the limited liability company, is 11790 Glen Road, Potomac, MD 20854.
(2)The amount shown and the following information is derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 14, 2019 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”), which sets forth Price Associates beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2018. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Price Associates has sole voting power over 4,643,372 shares and sole dispositive power over 13,988,736 shares. The business address of Price Associates is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.
(3)Includes 9,239,753 shares held by GRATs, 1,296,371 held by a revocable trust, 760,237 shares held by a family trust of which Mr. Steven Rales is the grantor, 375,000 shares owned by a charitable foundation of which Mr. Steven Rales is the sole director, and 19,388 shares held by Capital Yield Corporation, of which Mr. Mitchell Rales and Mr. Steven Rales are the sole stockholders. Mr. Steven Rales disclaims beneficial ownership of the 375,000 shares of common stock held by the charitable foundation. Mr. Steven Rales has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 10,911,124 shares of common stock, and shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 779,625 shares of common stock. The business address of Steven M. Rales is 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 800W, Washington, D.C. 20037-1701.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  49
(4)BDTCP GP I, LLC (“BDTCP GP I”) is the general partner of four investment funds that received these shares in distributions from BDT CF Acquisition Vehicle, LLC (the “BDT Investor”), an affiliate of BDTCP GP I. Beneficial ownership amount and nature of ownership is derived from a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on February 23, 2015 by (i) BDT CP, (ii) BDTCP GP I , (iii) Byron D. Trott, and (iv) BDTP GP, LLC (“BDTP”), from Forms 4 filed by Mr. Orr on June 16, 2015, May 19, 2016, and June 15, 2017, and from our internal records with respect to shares transferred by Mr. Orr following his retirement from our Board of Directors in 2018. Byron D. Trott is the sole member of BDTP, which is the managing member of BDT CP. BDT CP is the manager of BDTCP GP I. BDTInvestor beneficially owns 3,707 shares transferred to it by Mr. Orr. 351,422 shares of common stock were distributed to certain beneficial owners affiliated with BDTCP GP I from BDTCP Investments 2009, LLC (“BDTCP 2009”) for estate and charitable planning purposes. BDTCP 2009 is an investment vehicle for employees of BDT CP and its affiliates. BDTCP 2009 received these shares in distributions from the BDT Investor. BDTP indirectly controls BDTCP 2009 and BDTCP GP I. The business address of BDT Capital Partners, LLC is 401 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 3100, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
(5)The amount shown and the following information is derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 14, 2019 by Principal Global Investors, LLC (“Principal”), which sets forth Principal’s beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2018. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Principal has shared voting and dispositive power over 7,028,102 shares. The business address of Principal is 801 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, IA 50392.
(6)The amount shown and the following information is derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 11, 2019 by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”), which sets forth Vanguard’s beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2018. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Vanguard has sole voting power over 44,142 shares, shared voting power of 10,700 shares, sole dispositive power over 6,968,563 shares, and shared dispositive power over 45,140 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (“VFTC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 34,440 shares or .02% of the Common Stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. (“VIA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 20,402 shares or .01% of the Common Stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. The business address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(7)Includes 23,648 shares owned by the JWA Irrevocable Trust #1, 61,130 shares held by the JWA GRAT #4, 94,971 shares held by the JWA GRAT #5, 19,150 shares held by the JWA 2014 Trust, and 20,000 shares held by an irrevocable trust, of which Patrick Allender is a trustee. Mr. Allender disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares held by the JWA irrevocable trust, JWA GRATs, and the JWA 2014 Trust, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(8)Beneficial ownership by directors (other than Mitchell P. Rales) includes: (i) for each of Messrs. Allender and Gayner and Ms. Jordan, 30,004 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 24,423 shares that such individuals have the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019, (ii) for Mr. Perfall, 17,792 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 24,423 shares that Mr. Perfall has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019 (iv) for Mr. Vinnakota, 13,257 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 24,423 shares that Mr. Vinnakota has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019, (v) for Mr. Teirlinck, 3,826 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 5,302 shares that Mr. Teirlinck has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019, (vi) for Ms. Wienbar, 7,252 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 9,540 shares that Ms. Wienbar has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019, and (vii) DSUs received in lieu of annual cash retainers and committee chairperson retainers that will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board as follows: Mr. Allender—23,887, Mr. Gayner—19,463, Ms. Jordan— 22,066, Mr. Perfall— 16,982, Mr. Teirlinck— 3,405, and Ms. Wienbar— 5,559. For more information on these awards, see Director Compensation above.
(9)Includes 18,010 shares held by a family trust, 6,371 shares held by her spouse and 619 shares held in a trust account for her spouse.
(10)Includes 7,447 shares held by a trust.
(11)Beneficial ownership by named executive officers and our executive officers as a group includes shares that such individuals have the right to acquire upon the exercise of options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019. The number of shares included in the table as beneficially owned which are subject to such options is as follows: Mr. Trerotola— 179,553, Mr. Hix— 163,050, Mr. Pryor— 474,588, Mr. Kambeyanda— 72,067, Mr. Brander— 126,631, all of our current executive officers as a group— 1,015,889.
(12)Includes 3000 shares held by trusts for his children and 1,568 shares held in his 401(k) account.
(13)Includes 2,626 RSUs that will vest within 60 days of March 26, 2019.
(14)Includes 905 shares held by his spouse.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  50
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities. The Company’s Section 16 filing for its disposition of Circor Corporation shares in an underwritten offering on June 15, 2018 was disclosed via the Company’s press release and Circor Corporation filings atthat time and reported for Section 16 purposes on a Form 5 filed February 14, 2019. To our knowledge, based upon the reports filed and written representations regarding reports required during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, all other reports required by Section 16(a) were filed on a timely basis.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  51
GENERAL MATTERS

Outstanding Stock and Voting Rights

The Board has fixed the close of business on March 26, 2019 (the “Record Date”) as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record on that date will be entitled to vote. Proxies will be voted as specified in the stockholder’s proxy. In the absence of specific instructions, proxies will be voted in accordance with the Company’s recommendations and in the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matter which properly comes before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Board has selected Mitchell P. Rales, and Matthew L. Trerotolathe limited liability company, is 11790 Glen Road, Potomac, MD 20854.

(2)

The amount shown and the following information is derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 16, 2021 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”), which sets forth Price Associates’ beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. According to actthe Schedule 13G/A, Price Associates has sole voting power over 6,417,757 shares and sole dispositive power over 16,546,189 shares. The business address of Price Associates is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.

(3)

The amount shown and the following information is derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 5, 2021 by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”), which sets forth BlackRock’s beneficial ownership as proxies with fullof December 31, 2020. According to the Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock has sole voting power over 9,248,315 shares and sole dispositive power over 9,600,661 shares. The business address of BlackRock is BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

13


(4)

The amount shown and the following information is derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 10, 2021 by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”), which sets forth Vanguard’s beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Vanguard has shared voting power of substitution.64,568 shares, sole dispositive power over 8,889,016 shares, and shared dispositive power over 143,571 shares. The business address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

 

(5)

Any stockholderIncludes 8,410,679 shares of record giving a proxy has the power to revoke the proxy at any time before it is exercised by either (i) delivering a written notice of revocation to Colfax Corporation at 420 National Business Parkway, 5thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701, Attn: Corporate Secretary, (ii) delivering prior to the Annual Meeting a properly executed and subsequently dated proxy, or (iii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request. A beneficial stockholder who owns common stock in street name, meaning through a bank, broker or other nominee, should contact that entity to revoke a previously given proxy.

The Company will bear the total expense of this solicitation, including reimbursement paid to brokerage firmsheld by Mr. Steven M. Rales’ Revocable Trust. Mr. Steven M. Rales has sole voting power and others for their expenses in forwarding material regarding the Annual Meeting to beneficial owners. Solicitation of proxies may be made personally or by mail, telephone, Internet, e-mail or facsimile by officers and other management employees of the Company, who will receive no additional compensation for their services.

The holders of shares of the Company’s common stock are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, 117,558,414 shares of the Company’s common stock were outstanding. Each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters brought before the Annual Meeting.

A list of stockholders of record as of the Record Date will be available for inspection during ordinary business hours at our corporate headquarters located at 420 National Business Parkway, 5thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701, for 10 days prior to the date of our Annual Meeting. The list will also be available for inspection at the Annual Meeting.

The quorum necessary to conduct business at the Annual Meeting consists of a majority of the shares of the Company’s stock outstanding on the Record Date and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, either present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes (described below) are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. In accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws(the “Bylaws”), to be elected each director nominee must receive a majority of the votes castsole dispositive power with respect to that director’s election. Incumbent directors nominated for election8,410,679 shares of common stock. The business address of Steven M. Rales is 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 800 W, Washington, D.C. 20037-1701.

(6)

Includes 23,648 shares owned by the JWA Irrevocable Trust #1, 27,504 shares held by the JWA GRAT #4, 57,978 shares held by the JWA GRAT #5, 90,129 shares held by the JWA Irrevocable Trust #2, and 20,000 shares held by an irrevocable trust, of which Patrick Allender is a trustee. Mr. Allender disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares held by the JWA irrevocable trusts and the JWA GRATs, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(7)

Beneficial ownership by directors (other than Mitchell P. Rales) includes: (i) for each of Messrs. Allender and Gayner and Ms. Jordan, 34,785 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board are required,and 30,015 shares that such individuals have the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021, (ii) for Mr. Kelly, 3,260 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 7,741 shares that Mr. Kelly has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021, (iii) for Mr. Perfall, 22,573 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 30,015 shares that Mr. Perfall has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021, (iv) for Mr. Okala, 357 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 878 shares that Mr. Okala has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021, (v) for Mr. Teirlinck, 12,311 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 18,139 shares that Mr. Teirlinck has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021, (vi) for Mr. Vinnakota, 21,745 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 30,015 shares that Mr. Vinnakota has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021, (vii) for Ms. Wienbar, 13,885 DRSUs or DSUs that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021 and will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board and 22,377 shares that Ms. Wienbar has the right to acquire upon the exercise of director stock options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021, and (viii) DSUs received in lieu of annual cash retainers and committee chairperson retainers that will be delivered following the conclusion of service on the Board as follows: Mr. Allender—32,750, Mr. Gayner—26,981, Ms. Jordan— 22,066, Mr. Perfall— 26,609, Mr. Teirlinck— 10,923, and Ms. Wienbar— 13,077.

(8)

Includes 18,010 shares held by a family trust, 6,191 shares held by her spouse and 799 shares held in a trust account for her spouse.

(9)

Includes 7,447 shares held by a trust.

(10)

Beneficial ownership by named executive officers and our executive officers as a conditiongroup includes shares that such individuals have the right to acquire upon the exercise of options that have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 31, 2021. The number of shares included in the table as beneficially owned which are subject to such nomination, to submitoptions is as follows: Mr. Trerotola— 858,963, Mr. Hix— 354,667, Mr. Pryor— 597,227, Mr. Kambeyanda— 202,563, and Mr. Shirley—69,271, all of our current executive officers as a conditional letter of resignation to the Chairman of the Board. In the event that a nomineegroup— 2,121,167.

(11)

Includes 3,000 shares held by trusts for director does not receive a majority of the votes cast at the Annual his children and 2,312 shares held in his 401(k) account.

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting with respect to his or her election, the Board will promptly consider whether to accept or reject the conditional resignation of that nominee, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will then take action and will publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it no later than 90 days following the certification of election results.Proxy

Statement

    

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual

14


GENERAL MATTERS

Outstanding Stock and Voting Rights

The Board has fixed the close of business on January 10, 2022 (the “Record Date”) as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting. Only stockholders of record on that date will be entitled to vote. Proxies will be voted as specified in the stockholder’s proxy. In the absence of specific instructions, proxies will be voted in accordance with the Company’s recommendations. On any other matter which properly comes before the Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the proxies will be voted in the discretion of the proxy holders. The Board has selected Mitchell P. Rales and Matthew L. Trerotola to act as proxies with full power of substitution.

Any stockholder of record giving a proxy has the power to revoke the proxy at any time before it is exercised by either (i) delivering a written notice of revocation to Colfax Corporation at 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808, Attn: Corporate Secretary, (ii) delivering prior to the Special Meeting a properly executed and subsequently dated proxy, or (iii) virtually attending and voting at the Special Meeting. Attendance at the Special Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request or unless you vote at the Special Meeting. A beneficial stockholder who owns common stock in street name, meaning through a bank, broker or other nominee, should contact that entity to revoke a previously given proxy.

The Company will bear the total expense of this solicitation, including reimbursement paid to brokerage firms and others for their expenses in forwarding material regarding the Special Meeting to beneficial owners. Solicitation of proxies may be made personally or by mail, telephone, Internet, e-mail or facsimile by officers and other management employees of the Company, who will receive no additional compensation for their services.

The holders of shares of the Company’s common stock as of the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. As of the Record Date,                  shares of the Company’s common stock were outstanding. Each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters brought before the Special Meeting.

A list of stockholders of record as of the Record Date will be available for inspection during ordinary business hours at our corporate headquarters located at 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808, for 10 days prior to the date of our Special Meeting. The list will also be available for inspection at the Special Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM.

The quorum necessary to conduct business at the Special Meeting consists of the holders of a majority of the shares of the Company’s stock outstanding on the Record Date and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, either present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes (described below) are not counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock is required to approve the Reverse Stock Split Proposal.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve the Adjournment Proposal.

Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against approval of the Reverse Stock Split Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal. Under the rules of the NYSE, each of the proposals is a “routine” item. This means that brokerage firms that have not received voting instructions from their clients will have discretionary voting power to vote on these proposals, so we do not anticipate any brokerage firms failing to vote because they have not received voting instructions from their clients (“broker non-votes”).

Only stockholders as of the Record Date are entitled to attend the Special Meeting. To attend the Special Meeting, stockholders of record must go to the meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM and enter the control number found on the proxy card or the Notice previously received. If you are a beneficial stockholder who owns common stock in street name, meaning through a bank, broker or other nominee, and your voting instruction form or Notice indicates that you may vote those shares through the http://www.proxyvote.com website, then you may attend the Special Meeting using the 16-digit control number indicated on that voting instruction form or Notice. Otherwise, stockholders who hold their shares in street name should contact their bank, broker or other nominee and obtain a “legal proxy” in order to be able to attend the Special Meeting. Once admitted, during the Special Meeting, stockholders may vote, submit questions and view the list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Special Meeting by following the instructions available on the meeting website.

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting and entitled to vote is required for ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 and for approval of the advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officers.Proxy

Statement

    

Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors but will have the same effect as a vote against ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP or approval of the advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on behalf of clients who have not furnished voting instructions on the ratification of the selection of our registered public accounting firm. In contrast, the remaining proposals are “non-routine” items. This means brokerage firms that have not received voting instructions from their clients may not vote on these proposals (a “broker non-vote”). Broker non-votes will not be considered in determining the number of votes necessary for election and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote for the election of directors. Further, broker non-votes will have no effect on the advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.

Only stockholders as of the Record Date are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting in person. The names of stockholders of record will be on a list at the Annual Meeting and such stockholders may gain entry with a government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license, state-issued ID card, or passport. Beneficial stockholders who own common stock in street name, meaning through a bank, broker or other nominee, must present a government-issued photo identification and proof of beneficial stock ownership as of the Record Date (such as the Notice of Internet Availability, a copy of the proxy card received if one was sent to the stockholder or an account statement or other similar evidence showing stock ownership as of the Record Date) in order to gain entry to the Annual Meeting. Representatives of an entity that owns stock of the Company must present government-issued photo identification, evidence that they are the entity’s authorized

 

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  52

representative or proxyholder and, if the entity is a beneficial owner, proof of the entity’s beneficial stockownership as of the Record Date. A person who is not a stockholder will be entitled to admission only if he or she presents a valid legal proxy from a stockholder of record and government-issued photo identification. Eachstockholder may appoint only one proxy holder or representative to attend the meeting on his or her behalf.

Please note that the use of cameras (including cell phones with photographic capabilities), recording devices and other electronic devices is strictly prohibited at the meeting.

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations15

Requirements for Stockholder Proposals to be Considered for Inclusion in our Proxy Materials.To be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, stockholder proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on December 4, 2019.

Requirements for Stockholder Proposals to be Brought Before an Annual Meeting.Our Bylaws provide that, for a stockholder to nominate a candidate for election to the Board or propose any other business to be considered at an annual meeting other than through a proposal presented pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Company at Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701, Attn: Corporate Secretary. To be timely for an annual meeting, the stockholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary not less than the close of business 90 days nor more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the preceding annual meeting; accordingly, for the 2019 annual meeting, notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary no later than the close of business on February 13, 2020 and no earlier than January 14, 2020. However, if the annual meeting is set for a datethat is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after such anniversary, the Company must receive the notice not earlier than the 120thday prior to the annual meeting date and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90thday prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day when the Company makes a public announcement of the annual meeting date. Such notice must provide the information required by Section 2.2 of our Bylaws with respect to each matter, other than stockholder nominations of directors, that the stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting. Notice of stockholder nominations must provide the information required by Section 3.3 of our Bylaws. Both Section 2.2 and Section 3.3 of our Bylaws mandate certain additional information to be provided by a stockholder who wishes to introduce business or nominate a director candidate. The chairman of the annual meeting may refuse to acknowledge or introduce any nomination or proposal if notice thereof is not received within the applicable deadlines or does not otherwise comply with our Bylaws. If the stockholder does not provide notice of a nomination or proposal within the applicable deadlines or does not comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act, we may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies that we solicit to vote in accordance with our best judgment on any such nomination or proposal.

Delivery of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address

SEC rules permit the delivery of a single copy of a company’s annual report and proxy statement, or notice of internet availability of proxy materials, as applicable, to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. This procedure, referred to as householding, reduces the volume of duplicate information stockholders receive and reduces mailing and printing expenses.

The broker, bank or other nominee for any stockholder who is a beneficial owner of the Company’s stock may deliver only one copy of the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, to multiple stockholders who share the same address, unless that broker, bank or other nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. We will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Company’s AnnualReport to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. A stockholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, now or in the future, should submit a written request to Investor Relations, Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701 or call (301) 323-9000 and ask for Investor Relations. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, and wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all stockholders at the shared address in the future.

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  53


Back to Contents

Additional Information

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 has been made available concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Annual Report is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not considered proxy-soliciting material.

The Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC on February 21, 2019. The Company will mail without charge, upon written request, a copy of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, including financial statements but excluding exhibits. Exhibits, if requested, will be furnished upon the payment of a fee determined by the Company, such fee to be limited to the Company’s reasonable expenses in furnishing the requested exhibit or exhibits. Please send a written request to Investor Relations, Colfax Corporation, 420 National Business Parkway, 5thFloor, Annapolis Junction, Maryland 20701, or access these materials on the Company’s website atwww.colfaxcorp.comon the Investors page.

Other Matters

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board does not intend to present any matters other than those described herein at the Annual Meeting and is unaware of any matters to be presented by other parties. If other matters are properly brought before the meeting for action by the stockholders, proxies returned to us will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holder.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Curtis E. Jewell

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations

Requirements for Stockholder Proposals to be Brought Before an Annual Meeting. Our Bylaws provide that, for a stockholder to nominate a candidate for election to the Board or propose any other business to be considered at an annual meeting other than through a proposal presented pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Company at Colfax Corporation, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808, Attn: Corporate Secretary. To be timely for an annual meeting, the stockholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary not less than the close of business 90 days nor more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the preceding annual meeting; accordingly, for the 2022 annual meeting, notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary no later than the close of business on February 11, 2022 and no earlier than January 12, 2022. However, if the annual meeting is set for a date that is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after such anniversary, the Company must receive the notice not earlier than the 120th day prior to the annual meeting date and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day when the Company makes a public announcement of the annual meeting date. Such notice must provide the information required by Section 2.2 of our Bylaws with respect to each matter, other than stockholder nominations of directors, that the stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting. Notice of stockholder nominations must provide the information required by Section 3.3 of our Bylaws. Both Section 2.2 and Section 3.3 of our Bylaws mandate certain additional information to be provided by a stockholder who wishes to introduce business or nominate a director candidate. The chairman of the annual meeting may refuse to acknowledge or introduce any nomination or proposal if notice thereof is not received within the applicable deadlines or does not otherwise comply with our Bylaws. If the stockholder seeking to make a nomination or propose business pursuant to the advance notice provision of our Bylaws does not provide notice of a nomination or proposal within the applicable deadlines or does not comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act, we may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies that we solicit to vote in accordance with our best judgment on any such nomination or proposal.

Delivery of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address

SEC rules permit the delivery of a single copy of a company’s proxy statement, or notice of internet availability of proxy materials, as applicable, to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. This procedure, referred to as householding, reduces the volume of duplicate information stockholders receive and reduces mailing and printing expenses.

The broker, bank or other nominee for any stockholder who is a beneficial owner of the Company’s stock may deliver only one copy of the Company’s Proxy Statement or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, to multiple stockholders who share the same address, unless that broker, bank or other nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. We will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Company’s Proxy Statement or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. A stockholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of the Company’s Proxy Statement or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, now or in the future, should submit a written request to Investor Relations, Colfax Corporation, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808 or call (302) 252-9160 and ask for Investor Relations. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the Company’s Proxy Statement, or the Company’s Notice, as applicable, and wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all stockholders at the shared address in the future.

Other Matters

Our principal executive office is located at 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808. Our telephone number is (302) 252-9160 and our website is located at www.colfaxcorp.com. Our common stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol “CFX.” Upon our name change to Enovis Corporation following completion of the Spin-off, we will change our ticker symbol to “ENOV.”

No matters, other than the Reverse Stock Split Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal, will be presented for action at the Special Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Bradley J. Tandy

Secretary

 

 - 2019 Proxy Statement  54
Back to Contents

Back to Contents

  LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

16


Annex A

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

COLFAX CORPORATION

Colfax Corporation (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), does hereby certify as follows:

FIRST: The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by deleting Article 1 in its entirety and inserting the following in lieu thereof:

Article 1. NAME

The name of this corporation is Enovis Corporation.

SECOND: The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by deleting Section 4.1 of Article 4 in its entirety and inserting the following in lieu thereof:

4.1. Authorized Shares

The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is [Amendment A: 220,000,000; Amendment B: 153,333,333; Amendment C: 120,000,000] of which [Amendment A: 200,000,000; Amendment B: 133,333,333; Amendment C: 100,000,000] of such shares shall be Common Stock having a par value of $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), and 20,000,000 of such shares shall be Preferred Stock, having a par value of $.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”).

Upon the filing and effectiveness (the “Effective Time”) of this Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, each [Amendment A: two; Amendment B: three; Amendment C: four] shares of the Corporation’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall automatically be reclassified and combined into one validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable share of Common Stock without any further action by the Corporation or the holder thereof (the “Reverse Stock Split”). Notwithstanding the prior sentence, no fractional shares shall be issued at the Effective Time as a result of the Reverse Stock Split and, in lieu thereof, the Corporation’s transfer agent shall aggregate all fractional shares remaining after the Reverse Stock Split and sell them as soon as practicable after the Effective Time at the then-prevailing prices on the open market, on behalf of those stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share, and after the transfer agent’s completion of such sale, stockholders shall receive a cash payment (without interest or deduction) from the transfer agent in an amount equal to their respective pro rata share of the total net proceeds of that sale. Each stock certificate that,

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

A-1


immediately prior to the Effective Time, represented shares of Common Stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, from and after the Effective Time, automatically and without the necessity of presenting the same for exchange, represent that the number of whole shares of Common Stock after the Effective Time into which the shares of Common Stock formerly represented by such certificate shall have been reclassified in the Reverse Stock Split, provided, however, that each person of record holding a certificate that represented shares of Common Stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall receive, upon surrender of such certificate, a new certificate evidencing and representing the number of whole shares of Common Stock after the Effective Time into which the shares of Common Stock formerly represented by such certificate shall have been reclassified in the Reverse Stock Split.”

THIRD: This Amendment shall become effective as of [], 2022 at [] [a.m./p.m.]

FOURTH: This Amendment was duly adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the DGCL.

*            *            *

LOGO

- 2022 Special

Meeting Proxy

Statement

A-2


LOGO

SCAN TO COLFAX CORPORATION VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE w 2711 CENTERVILLE ROAD SUITE 400 WILMINGTON, DE 19808 VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 27, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 27, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D65075-S37863-Z81627 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY COLFAX CORPORATION Company Proposals The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 1 and 2. For Against Abstain 1. To approve and adopt an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect (a) a reverse stock split of our common stock at one of three reverse stock split ratios, one-for-two, one-for-three and one-for-four, with an exact ratio to be determined by our Board at a later date, ! ! ! and (b) a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of our common stock by the selected reverse stock split ratio. 2. To approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the ! ! ! reverse stock split proposal at the Special Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. NOTE: The undersigned authorizes the proxies to vote according to their discretion on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Yes No Please indicate if you plan to attend the virtual meeting. ! ! Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement are available at www.proxyvote.com.

D65076-S37863-Z81627
COLFAX CORPORATION
Special Meeting of Stockholders
February 28, 2022, 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

Mitchell P. Rales and Matthew L. Trerotola, or either of them, each with the full power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and to vote all of the shares of COLFAX CORPORATION common stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Special Meeting of Stockholders of COLFAX CORPORATION to be held virtually at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Monday, February 28, 2022 at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CFX2022SM, and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

The above named proxies will vote the shares represented hereby as directed on the other side of this card, and if no such direction is made, the above named proxies will vote “FOR” Proposals 1 and 2. The above named proxies may vote according to their discretion on any other matter which may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. The undersigned may revoke this proxy prior to its exercise.
Please fill the appropriate boxes, sign and date on the other side of this card.